Hey! I thought you were all tuckered out! 
Please see my last post - has been edited.
OK. But I think it's a stretch to use that to back up the assertion that we can intuitively, definitively ascertain whether a 6D SMC has polarity.
Right. To be more precise: I'm reluctant to say that Ra has polarity, positive or not.
Because Ra said in 6D positive/negative polarity becomes history, and that they seek without polarity.
I can't get around those 2 quotes. I don't see how it could be said that Ra has polarity, if, in 6D, polarity ceases. That just doesn't work for me. I am taking Ra's word for it, and trying to understand how those statements can be true. I am starting from the presupposition that Ra's words are true, because that is what I'm choosing to believe.
I do, however, perceive Ra's service as resulting in that which is positive, for me, because it has a positive effect on my life. It might have the opposite effect if I read it to my fundamentalist sister.
I just see those as 2 separate things.
Yes, and the whole post, actually.
In English grammatical terms:
I interpret
'Service to Others' as a name, a definition...
differently from how I interpret
'Service' to others as a noun describing an action, ie. the action of serving, and being directed towards other selves.
Ra provides service to others, no question about that. (think: verb)
But does Ra have the Service to Others polarity? (think: name defining a polarity) Not according to the above quotes. I don't see how they could, if polarity has become history for them.
Please see my last post - has been edited.
(10-23-2010, 11:05 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote:Quote:58.22 ...Contact with indigo ray need not necessarily show itself in any certain gift or guidepost, as you have said. There are some whose indigo energy is that of pure being and never is manifested, yet all are aware of such an entity’s progress. Others may teach or share in many ways contact with intelligent energy. Others continue in unmanifested form, seeking intelligent infinity.
Thus the manifestation is lesser signpost than that which is sensed or intuited about a mind/body/spirit complex. This violet ray being-ness is far more indicative of true self.
OK. But I think it's a stretch to use that to back up the assertion that we can intuitively, definitively ascertain whether a 6D SMC has polarity.
(10-23-2010, 11:05 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: No, I don't think you're saying Ra is negative. But I do think you're reluctant to say that Ra is positive.
Right. To be more precise: I'm reluctant to say that Ra has polarity, positive or not.
Because Ra said in 6D positive/negative polarity becomes history, and that they seek without polarity.
I can't get around those 2 quotes. I don't see how it could be said that Ra has polarity, if, in 6D, polarity ceases. That just doesn't work for me. I am taking Ra's word for it, and trying to understand how those statements can be true. I am starting from the presupposition that Ra's words are true, because that is what I'm choosing to believe.
I do, however, perceive Ra's service as resulting in that which is positive, for me, because it has a positive effect on my life. It might have the opposite effect if I read it to my fundamentalist sister.
I just see those as 2 separate things.
(10-23-2010, 11:05 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: I went back and re-read that post, but I'm not sure which part you're thinking of. Is it this? "I think it depends on what you mean by the term service to others. It's not really a definition of the positive polarity. It is the percentage of service to others that is the definition of positive polarity."
Or this? "Thus, it appears to me that the term service to others, as a description of the positive polarity, cannot be separated. However, as a description of what is actually happening, ie. being of service, then it is distinct from polarity, because surely Ra serves others, yet has no polarity."
Yes, and the whole post, actually.
In English grammatical terms:
I interpret
'Service to Others' as a name, a definition...
differently from how I interpret
'Service' to others as a noun describing an action, ie. the action of serving, and being directed towards other selves.
Ra provides service to others, no question about that. (think: verb)
But does Ra have the Service to Others polarity? (think: name defining a polarity) Not according to the above quotes. I don't see how they could, if polarity has become history for them.