6D Wanderers: 3D Lessons?

[Monica]

Ra says that the negative path is the path of that which is not and that in sixth density the negative polarity is abandoned. I infer from this that the positive path is the path of that which is and that the positive polarity is not abandoned in sixth density, meaning that even though Ra seeks without polarity they themselves are still positively-polarized.

Regarding your discussion of measurements, percentages, entities, and polarity: the percentages define where on the scale of STO/STS the entity is, just like entities come out somewhere on all the other scales that can be made from the pairs of opposites: tall/short, fat/skinny, rich/poor, etc.

I understand your point. I see it differently. I see 6D+ as totality, or at least nearing totality and the reconciliation of paradox. What is paradox if not the illusion of separation? To be labeled as still of one polarity, is to still dwell in separation, because there must be an opposite existing somewhere.

Ra always speaks in terms of reconciling opposites: teach/learn, etc. and in the very first contact, stated that they were about the reconciliation of paradox.

Ra stated that Jesus approached 100% STO, and this was illustrated by him having nearly zero love for self and nearly total love for others, resulting in sacrificing himself for the sake of others. I don't see Ra like that at all.

I see Ra as having balance of self-love and love of other-selves, together with wisdom.

Because the STS entities have merged into Oneness with others, the whole purpose of having 2 polarities becomes moot.

What is the purpose of the 2 paths? How do STS entities serve? By providing catalyst. That is their task. Why is catalyst needed? Because 3D entities must make the Choice, and then balance that Choice in the next 2 densities.

For these purposes, STS entities play a very important role. They are still serving the Creator, by seemingly serving only themselves. But, since we are all ONE, this would indicate that they ARE serving us as well. How can they not? If they serve themselves and the Creator, then they serve us, even though it might appear that they are opposing us.

By 6D, the lessons for evolving are different. Polarity no longer comes into play. There is no longer any need for such illusions of separation.

Even though the Veil doesn't exist in, say, 5D, if the STS entities still think they are separate, then that would indicate that they still have some sort of veil of illusion, else they would realize they aren't separate, which they eventually do realize, by 6D at the latest.

Ra did not share with us all the mechanisms of the STS path - only that which was directly asked. It seems to me that, if they still think they're separate, even as late as early 6D, then there is some sort of illusion still going on for them.

I don't see how Ra could seek without polarity and yet still be polarized. If they seek, and they are polarized, then how can that be separated?

Polarization is an attribute.

Let's try substituting another attribute, just to see how it works:

Suppose I said I have compassion. That is part of who and what I am. I cannot separate myself from it. I cannot help but act with compassion.

Now, I say that I am also seeking. How do I seek? By enjoying opportunities to serve.

Is it possible for me to serve without compassion?

Is it possible for me to seek without compassion?

How, then, could Ra serve or seek without polarity?

If you just substitute compassion for polarity, it sheds some light on it.

I am NOT saying compassion = polarity. As stated in my previous post, compassion is a by-product of polarity. I am just substituting the terms, to illustrate my point, which is I don't see how Ra could seek without polarity, if they were polarized.

I see Ra as serving the Creator, and both self as well as other-self. There is no longer any distinction for them. Polarity is a concept that is relevant only to us, and for the STS entities who still think they're separated, who do not yet fully realize that Oneness.

I keep going back to the symbol of the The Tao, because it illustrates the concept so well. The superficial interpretation of The Tao is that the yin and yang are separate. But that is looking at it from the viewpoint of separation. The Tao is actually spinning. There is no yin or yang from the perspective of The Tao.