6D Wanderers: 3D Lessons?

[Monica]

Ra did say that they have become light; they said it earlier in the quote that you cited.

True. Why do you think Ra then qualified it with a more precise term, love/light and light/love?

I think about this way: Ra said positive fourth-density entities will approach 98% service to others.

Ra also said that the extreme compassion of 4D must be balanced with the wisdom of 5D.

My guess is that by late sixth density Ra has become 100% service to others and hence, have become light.

Then do you think 5D is all about getting that last 2%?

That doesn't quite make sense to me. How can adding 2% to 98% be considered balancing?

They seek without polarity because there is no more polarity outside of themselves to gain; instead that which they seek is within.

Do we even have any reason to think that a numerical value of polarity is relevant for 6D? Has Ra ever indicated as such?

In the quote you cited:

It then seems that there is an extreme potential in this polarization the same as there is in electricity. We have a positive and negative pole.

...I agree that is a definition of polarity. But Ra is referring to those who are either STO or STS, and defines the difference as well as the mechanism by which an entity can switch polarities.

Has Ra ever given any indication that this applies to them?

polarization is building a charge in consciousness and with it the ability to do work.

What is a charge, without its opposite? In electricity, negative and positive charges react to form the power.

When I first read the Law of One 25 years ago, one of the most striking revelations for me was that, eventually, 'good' and 'evil' would be merged, harmonized. It gave me great comfort to realize that we wouldn't always be fighting a battle against the 'dark forces.'

The way I understood it then, and understand it now, is that, sometime in 6D, the negative and positive paths converge and merge, as the 2 opposing tribes did in the movie The Dark Crystal (which I saw right after reading the Law of One and, though boring, was exceedingly profound).

I see the 2 paths like the yin and yang, which spin one into the other.

I see Ra, dwelling in 6D beyond polarity, as the Tao, symbolized as the yin and yang spinning, one flowing into the other, but no longer distinct; ie. Oneness.

In the Tao, there is no negative or positive. From the perspective of the Tao, there is no yin or yang. There is only One.

This is how I view those who have harmonized love/light and light/love and become One.

Ra clearly serves others, and admits to a bias towards STO. This we know. That is their service.

So the question then becomes: Is Ra seeking without polarity because they are already 100% and can progress no further?

Or is Ra seeking without polarity because polarity is no longer relevant, just as the yin is no longer relevant to the Tao?

As long as Ra is continuing to seek and to balance, I don't see how we can assume they are 100% anything.

Polarity, then, simply means positive (STO) or negative (STS);

Positive or negative what?

No entity, at least in 3D, is 100% positive or negative.

If it was an absolute, then entities wouldn't be able to lose polarity.

If an STO entity is 95% STO, but loses 30% polarity, that entity is still STO, overall, by being 65% STO.

But if a 65% STO entity loses 30% polarity, is the entity still STO?

No, because the overall charge has dropped below the threshold of what defines STO polarity.

To say that an entity is either STO or STS, does not define what that is.

the percentages you cite are measures of polarity rather than polarity itself.

If, as you say, the percentages do not define whether the entity is STS or STO, then what does?

It seems to me, that by attributing polarity to Ra, that is implying that there is still an opposing force, or charge, opposing 6D entities.

My understanding is that all had been reconciled and harmonized, regarding polarities, by that point.

This was one of the key understanding I got when I first read the Law of One, so I am hoping to understand how you view this.