(10-07-2010, 06:34 PM)unity100 Wrote:(10-07-2010, 05:20 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: You missed an important word. It involves becoming more and more balanced and radiant. Both are important.
polarity has no relevance to balance.
That's how I'm reading this quote:
Quote:64.5 ...We seek now without polarity. Thus we do not invoke any power from without, for our search has become internalized as we become light/love and love/light. These are the balances we seek, the balances between compassion and wisdom which more and more allow our understanding of experience to be informed that we may come closer to the unity with the One Creator which we so joyfully seek.
...taken together with this quote:
Quote:89.29 Ra: I am Ra. Those of us which had the gift of polarity felt deep compassion for those who seemed to dwell in darkness.
...I understand Ra to be saying:
They seek without polarity.
They seek the balance between compassion and wisdom.
Polarity does not = compassion (else the statement would be redundant).
Compassion is one of the fruits, or results, of positive polarity.
Polarity does not = balance: since they seek balance without polarity, then balance cannot be = polarity.
(10-07-2010, 06:34 PM)unity100 Wrote: since the extreme love of 4d is dubbed as imbalanced and unwise by Ra,
Unwise for Ra. Not necessarily unwise for us.
Imbalanced, to be sure. But perhaps necessary in certain instances, such as the mission of Jesus.
Also, did Ra ever define at exactly what point compassion becomes extreme? We know Jesus had extreme compassion, but justifiably so, in order to fulfill his mission. We also know that Ra was imbalanced towards compassion and then had to balance. But how do we determine what is appropriate for us? Wouldn't it depend on our own particular mission?
(10-07-2010, 06:34 PM)unity100 Wrote: - positive polarity of 4d entities approach 99% harmoniously upon graduation
- ra had to spend extra time in 5d to BALANCE the extreme love and compassion they gained in 4d.
that means, polarity != balance. there is no relevance in between them.
Perhaps it is designed such that balance can only be achieved after 5D. Perhaps 4D is designed to be out of balance, though not necessarily to the degree that Ra was, and the purpose of 5D is to provide the wisdom which will balance the compassion.
(10-07-2010, 06:34 PM)unity100 Wrote: this doesnt even make sense. what is 'becoming light'. everything existing is energy, vibrating in various frequencies. 1d red is also light, 8d white is also light. there is nothing that is not 'light' in that regard.
That statement you were responding to was incomplete. Ra didn't say they became light. They said they had become light/love and love/light:
Quote:64.5 ...We seek now without polarity. Thus we do not invoke any power from without, for our search has become internalized as we become light/love and love/light.
There must be a reason for this distinction (though I'm not certain exactly what it is, heh).
(10-22-2010, 08:35 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Again, there seems to be some basic confusion here. There are two polarities, service to others and service to self. It's not possible to "liberate" service to others from polarity any more than it's possible to liberate positive or negative force from a magnet.
I think it depends on what you mean by the term service to others. It's not really a definition of the positive polarity. It is the percentage of service to others that is the definition of positive polarity.
Ra stated that they seek without polarity.
Ra serves others.
Ra is 6D.
At some point in 6D, polarity "becomes history."
Quote:47.5 ...The positive/negative polarity is a thing which will, at the sixth level, simply become history. Therefore, we speak in an illusory time continuum when we discuss statistics of positive versus negative harvest into fifth.
Thus, it appears to me that the term service to others, as a description of the positive polarity, cannot be separated. However, as a description of what is actually happening, ie. being of service, then it is distinct from polarity, because surely Ra serves others, yet has no polarity.
For example, a negatively polarized entity might have 3% STO, and be guilty of a teeny tiny selfless act (like in that Star Trek episode when the entity helped the Enterprise...that illustrates it quite well). That entity might do a tiny good deed...and in that moment, the 3% STO surfaces. Yet, the entity is still polarized STS, because of the net percentage.
Likewise, all of us STO entities sometimes are guilty of less-than-stellar actions...STS actions. We get by because we're more than 51%.
So it's not STO or STS that determines polarity; it's the percentage overall that determines polarity.