10-23-2016, 02:57 PM
(10-23-2016, 02:44 PM)octavia Wrote: Hello Anagogy,
My first paragraph speaks specifically to the analogy that was given.
My second paragraph concerns an incompatibility between the analogy and the assertions made concerning the nature of service.
My advice is to not get too overly hung up on analogies. They are far from perfect (meaning, it doesn't necessarily capture the full reality of the situation so to respond to it any further would just create more confusion.)
Your implication was that something was being forced on someone. The truth is no one is forced to accept the truth I'm offering. People are free to keep subscribing to their misguided and accusatory divisive ideologies that attempt to correct disharmony by introducing a focus on more disharmony. That is their prerogative.
(10-23-2016, 02:44 PM)octavia Wrote: The ideas shared earlier concerning whether it is advisable to explore race, sexuality, and so on, and to what extent this can be done before the viewer sees more dissimilarities between entities than similarities, and the evaluation of the modern phenomenon of what have been called Social Justice Warriors, are indeed complex proposed corollaries to the principle that an entity creates their own reality. As such they are subject to hearty debate even if each entity within the discussion subscribes to the principle of the entity who creates their own reality.
Disagreement is inevitable, because the world still mostly isn't ready to understand how thoughts become things. Most people don't really want to know that yet. People love to take responsibility for good things, but never the bad. It's human nature.
