10-23-2016, 10:37 AM
(10-22-2016, 11:27 AM)anagogy Wrote: Nobody is saying that racism doesn't exist, and nobody is saying that sexism doesn't exist, and nobody is saying victims are the aggressors or that their wounds "don't matter", and if that is what you are taking away from this, then you simply aren't understanding what is being said.
(10-21-2016, 11:51 AM)Minyatur Wrote: Gender, race, sexual orientation does not matter, to focus on this is to reinforce separation among people based on these traits and reinforce the manifestation of this dissonance of perspective within the planetary mind.
Did I misinterpret this sentence? This sentence that you quoted/bolded because you vehemently agreed with its point?
(10-21-2016, 11:54 AM)anagogy Wrote:(10-21-2016, 11:51 AM)Minyatur Wrote: Gender, race, sexual orientation does not matter, to focus on this is to reinforce separation among people based on these traits and reinforce the manifestation of this dissonance of perspective within the planetary mind.
That's a great point.
Are you intentionally gaslighting? Or am I being trolled?
Minyatur Wrote:The USA is probably the worst example of a country (ok, maybe not but maybe so still) and your society has it's root issues that makes it so.
There are so many other countries that have much worse cases of gender and racism issues. The US is just the most advanced/refined with its discrimination. There are plenty of civil wars and people dying every day because of their race. This is still a huge wound in our planetary sphere. I am glad places like Canada (84% caucasian) do not have racial issues. People are being murdered en masse in other countries because of their race right now.
When you say, "these things don't exist", this is repression. You must acknowledge the pain in others/the planetary complex. These things do exist. Separation exists. Fourth density will take at least 70 more years of work to birth before we can even be near the point of becoming a social memory complex. We must practice acceptance for these things, because without acceptance, there can be no healing.
Ra Wrote:The general cause of service such as the Confederation offers is that of the primal distortion of the Law of One, which is service. The One Being of the creation is like unto a body, if you will accept this third-density analogy. Would we ignore a pain in the leg? A bruise upon the skin? A cut which is festering? No. There is no ignoring a call. We, the entities of sorrow, choose as our service the attempt to heal the sorrow which we are calling analogous to the pains of a physical body complex distortion.
This whole thing plays out in my mind as such: A man walks into a doctor's office with a stab wound. He says, "Doctor, someone did this to me!! It hurts!!" and the doctor says "Hmm yes this is apparently so. What did you do to this person to make them stab you? Are they injured as well? Are you sure you didn't just stab yourself? Have you tried just stitching the wound up on your own? I can certainly stitch the wound up myself - I mean, I've never had a stab wound, but I'm a doctor so I'm good at these things and really understand you. But I don't think stab wounds exist as you believe they do."
anagogy Wrote:I'm gonna cut you off right there, because I've never personally derived a great deal of inspiration or validity from Q'uo channelings. Conscious channeling is virtually never unbiased and often times just reflects the distorted and very human biases present in the channeler. To be honest, I find that quote completely unintelligible and nonsensical. And by the way, I wasn't stating it as some kind of absolute rule, just as a fitting adage to the context of the discussion. Truly, if an intention were "pure" and non-contradicted, and sustained, attention would naturally gravitate to the correct vibrational focus for accomplishing the intent. However, many people start off with good intentions which then devolve to something that is, shall we say, "less pure". They become side tracked by distractions that disperse any collected energy, which is what you see with most of these SJW movements.
It seems here you are being intentionally dismissive. Q'uo makes an extremely good point that intentions are everything. Yet you say the road to hell is paved with good intentions? I mean, you could say "good intentions gone awry" but that's for each to decide, their purity within. This is why I'm a big fan of studying the transformation of the mind, since it's the root of the basis of our polarity and purity of intentions. All done in love is never wrong. If you're trying to "teach someone a lesson", well, my guess is that intention is often misguided at best. That even might be where the "SJW movement" goes awry.
I also feel it's probably important to point out that just because it's a colloquialism doesn't make it true!! For what it's worth, my husband always interpreted that colloquialism to mean that it's difficult to do good, not that doing good brings you to a bad place. Your interpretation is, again, making the victims into aggressors. Saying that those who are trying to do good, out of pain, are causing more pain because of their lack of purity, is exactly that. It's expected that those who aren't consciously aware of the transformation will wobble as Ra says. So yes, purity is extremely difficult but I definitely advocate a purity to courting the maiden as you are aware. In my experience, this hasn't "led me to hell".
anagogy Wrote:There is an abundance of love in the material, that's for sure (which is sometimes what is needed -- the fluffiness, rather than tough love).
I would argue that love - the fluffy, green ray kind, is ALL that is needed to heal 3rd density into fourth. Wisdom doesn't begin to factor in as necessary for sequential progression until the next density. So why are you scoffing at fluffy love?
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)