10-22-2016, 01:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-22-2016, 07:47 PM by octavia.
Edit Reason: Corrected names used for present channelers of Q'uo
)
(10-22-2016, 12:21 PM)octavia Wrote: I'm gonna cut you off right there, because I've never personally derived a great deal of inspiration or validity from Q'uo channelings. Conscious channeling is virtually never unbiased and often times just reflects the distorted and very human biases present in the channeler. To be honest, I find that quote completely unintelligible and nonsensical. And by the way, I wasn't stating it as some kind of absolute rule, just as a fitting adage to the context of the discussion. Truly, if an intention were "pure" and non-contradicted, and sustained, attention would naturally gravitate to the correct vibrational focus for accomplishing the intent. However, many people start off with good intentions which then devolve to something that is, shall we say, "less pure". They become side tracked by distractions that disperse any collected energy, which is what you see with most of these SJW movements.
The focus on what is wrong with world just creates more of it, unless you merely use it as a turning point to focus on what is wanted instead.
Hi Anagogy,
I do not claim that Q'uo is unbiased. However, I do think that they communicate the difficulties in that adage better than I could. Moreover, the consistency of the Confederation messages received by L/L Research are extraordinarily internally consistent. I have found this to remain true despite changes in density of the channeled Confederation source and on behalf of the channeler themself.
To give an example of this factual consistency: compare this old Hatonn channeling to Ra, both concerning the nature of Homosexuality. There are some very basic consistencies in their message, although Ra's perspective is much more exacting, and with a greater specificity of information.
Quote:[1976.7.18] Questioner: What is the function of homosexuality?
It is a difficulty of your language that we have trouble overcoming in that homosexuality is not understood as a type of sexuality, but is considered to be, in your language, a type of emotionally strong word.
The function of sexuality is to teach service. One is drawn to another of your species and forms a relationship and in that relationship, there are opportunities for service, or disservice, and gradually, as the spirit grows through this association, you begin to learn how to be of service. Were it not for the drive of sexuality, it is likely that there would not be these intense relationships, and therefore these strong stimulants or catalysts to learning. Those who are homosexual have had a personality difficulty which drives then in a sexual way towards their own charge, much like a positive charge being attracted to a positive charge. This is due to confusion between incarnations, the previous incarnation being of one sex, this incarnation being of another. But the function of homosexuality is the function of any type of sexuality: it is to enable a person to form an intense enough relationship that he may learn how to serve and how to love; to love others more than himself, or shall we say, to love others more than his personality, but as much as the Creator.
Quote:[31.8] Questioner: We have what seems to be an increasing number of entities incarnate here now who have what is called a homosexual orientation in this respect. Could you explain and expand upon that concept?
Ra: I am Ra. Entities of this condition experience a great deal of distortion due to the fact that they have experienced many incarnations as biological male and as biological female. This would not suggest what you call homosexuality in an active phase were it not for the difficult vibratory condition of your planetary sphere. There is what you may call great aura infringement among your crowded urban areas in your more populous countries, as you call portions of your planetary surface. Under these conditions the confusions will occur.
Furthermore, I do not think it is true that "Conscious channeling is virtually never unbiased and often times just reflects the distorted and very human biases present in the channeler." at least where Q'uo is concerned. In many of the more recent channelings of Q'uo, Q'uo swaps from channeling one person to another. I believe Jim and Steve T. are the two current channelers for Q'uo. In order for this theory on human bias to be true in this specific instance, we would see a large swing in tone and content that would be evident to a casual reader. However, although I have not read even the majority of more recent Q'uo channelings, I do not know of one instance in which this can be said to have occurred.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)