(10-20-2010, 11:12 AM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: If by that you mean, "Does everyone agree that polarization = compassion alone?" I'd have to say the answer is no. In fact, I'm not sure anyone agrees.
compassion should be a side effect, or, a manifestation of the concept of polarity. positive polarity seems to be giving to others, neglect of self, to the point of sacrifice. negative, seems to be the opposite.
Quote:Peregrine's questions are relevant because they address the heart of the thread: what do we do now that we're here on this planet at this time?
he is trying to basically go around the fact that Ra is an entity that serves, yet, they are not positively polarized and seeking without polarity. in this process, he is attempting to redefine polarity by 'serving the creatrix' and then attributing it to Ra.
(10-20-2010, 04:03 PM)peregrine Wrote: Let's call that your choice.
I'll conclude, then, with a summation of my view of our discussion.
I observe that polarization comes in two shades, light & dark or STO & STS. In 6D where other selves are not viewed as other selves but as aspects of the Creatrix, these two paths collapse in into one, Service to the Creatrix, pure and simple. However, since 3D is not 6D, this does not apply here. (In part, this is because unbeknownst to our conscious selves, we are continually acting in STO & STS ways unconsciously. It's not until 6D that these can be completely sorted out and balanced.) The alternative to all of this is confusion, indifference, arrogance and whatever else may distract one from polarization, i.e., the sinkhole. The central nerve here is indifference leading to seeking leading to service and polarity leading to purity of being.
You have been indifferent to discussing service and your own inclination (if any) towards seeking while you disparage of polarization. Moreover, you continually confuse the discussion with unsubstantiated beliefs and conclusions.
If you don't yet know what you're seeking, then this conversation will have to be postponed until that time. If we're not reaching for a goal here, then what's the point of discussing all this? It has no practical value--discounting the entertainment factor.
'postpone this conversation' indefinitely then, for a conversation as such, in which you are redefining concepts and then attributing them to entities and society complexes would not go anywhere.
this is not about 'my choice' or 'their choice' or 'your choice'. or 'creatrix' or anything else.
this is about the concept of polarity.
ra defines the concept of polarity in a certain manner. then they say that, they are seeking without polarity, as of their density.
from this point on, you cannot establish analogy in between them 'serving the creator' and you 'serving the creator' and then come up saying that they are polarized.
they, are not polarized.
what they are seeking, what are their choices, what is your choice, what is my choice, what anyone is seeking, do not change this fact :
they defined polarity, and then they said they are seeking without polarity. that means, they are seeking without polarity.