10-20-2010, 08:08 PM
I think thought-form entities can explain a lot of our monsters in the world today. I believe there are exceptions to this, as there will always be creatures that we never encounter under a microscope (I really hope that Mokele m'bembe turns out to be an actual creature), but for the most part they seem to be thought-forms. Take the Loch Ness Monster for instance. Sightings of that creature have been around since the 1400 or 1500s. Yet if you look at the logic behind a creature of that size living in the Loch, the amount of food needed to sustain not only one, but presumably a small herd of these creatures, it just becomes more and more far fetched. And believe me, I would rather find out there IS a creature there, I've been drawn to these kinds of myths and legends as far back as I remember. It simply seems more likely that the majority of them can be explained by thought-forms.
I'm not an expert, but it seems that many people believed in sea monsters for thousands of years. Throw that in with encounters of likely real creatures, and over time you have this sort of energy cloud coming into focus. People want to believe in the unexplainable and mysterious. That desire adds to that energy, until thought-forms can manifest in a visible form. I don't know how this ties into the anti-matter universe, where I understand it to be that thought-forms are the bread and butter of existance?
I'm not an expert, but it seems that many people believed in sea monsters for thousands of years. Throw that in with encounters of likely real creatures, and over time you have this sort of energy cloud coming into focus. People want to believe in the unexplainable and mysterious. That desire adds to that energy, until thought-forms can manifest in a visible form. I don't know how this ties into the anti-matter universe, where I understand it to be that thought-forms are the bread and butter of existance?