10-06-2016, 04:53 PM
Hello Dear OpalE,
Thank You for sharing so eloquently your experiences here with Us.
I also had many moments with The Law of One when I was so irritated that I had to put it aside – sometimes for weeks. But I’ve never skipped anything because I wanted to know everything this Idea contains and than to judge it / test it. I’m wondering what exactly is the nature of your anger at this Material? Is it because presented concepts angry You in some way? Or maybe because what is suggested is not consistent with the content of your own experience?
I think that your “two ways” with this material are aiding You greatly in being centered / balanced while learning this Information. I would suggest to delay judging part (or “trying on part”) and to make honest and your Best attempt to build/create “whole picture” described by Ra. Some concepts are indeed quite far-out but in overall take they are the “meaning-blocks” that tries to describe non-material environment to the material creature. Our limitations/nature of understanding requires symbols/concepts to operate with and to create representations of phenomenon/environments not directly available to default human being perception/comprehension.
I myself prefer structure, so I was Grateful for Ra’s Teachings/Learnings. Words of Ra and Seth organized/uncluttered/brought Order to my Understanding and gave me some sort of “springboard” for/in my own Seekings.
If content of Ra Materials is Valid, theoretically due to enlarged/broader Understanding You should be more receptive for experiences of non-material nature. Especially that You’ve wrote of couple of those in your past that were continuous/systematic – i.e. your relation with AM-N.
About that – I’m wondering how did You learned to write this name? Especially interesting for me is dash/hyphen/em dash. Because if You’ve wrote it from “hearing”, this Entity would simply made pause and it would be “AM N” (?)
Please excuse my minuteness of detail – it’s something I’m struggling with during my current existence.
I liked that expression/description of inner events. I also think You are right.
May word/label/symbol “collecting” be replaced with “building” or “sculpturing” from the point of view of your Understanding / the way You approach Self/Other Self/Creation?
Literally a moment ago a thought approached me regarding your “two ways” situation.
Thought content: If you were a Wanderer of the Ra Social Memory Complex You might would have some issues with this Material. I have no idea what kind of issues though. Glitch-like maybe?
Welcome to the Forum.
All I have Best in me for You
Thank You for sharing so eloquently your experiences here with Us.
I also had many moments with The Law of One when I was so irritated that I had to put it aside – sometimes for weeks. But I’ve never skipped anything because I wanted to know everything this Idea contains and than to judge it / test it. I’m wondering what exactly is the nature of your anger at this Material? Is it because presented concepts angry You in some way? Or maybe because what is suggested is not consistent with the content of your own experience?
I think that your “two ways” with this material are aiding You greatly in being centered / balanced while learning this Information. I would suggest to delay judging part (or “trying on part”) and to make honest and your Best attempt to build/create “whole picture” described by Ra. Some concepts are indeed quite far-out but in overall take they are the “meaning-blocks” that tries to describe non-material environment to the material creature. Our limitations/nature of understanding requires symbols/concepts to operate with and to create representations of phenomenon/environments not directly available to default human being perception/comprehension.
I myself prefer structure, so I was Grateful for Ra’s Teachings/Learnings. Words of Ra and Seth organized/uncluttered/brought Order to my Understanding and gave me some sort of “springboard” for/in my own Seekings.
If content of Ra Materials is Valid, theoretically due to enlarged/broader Understanding You should be more receptive for experiences of non-material nature. Especially that You’ve wrote of couple of those in your past that were continuous/systematic – i.e. your relation with AM-N.
About that – I’m wondering how did You learned to write this name? Especially interesting for me is dash/hyphen/em dash. Because if You’ve wrote it from “hearing”, this Entity would simply made pause and it would be “AM N” (?)
Please excuse my minuteness of detail – it’s something I’m struggling with during my current existence.
(09-25-2016, 04:33 PM)OpalE Wrote: (...)
We are all connected, literally rather than metaphorically. Together we are 'moving something towards something,' from the sidelines and as one, like guardians or ushers. I can ALMOST hear them. I sometimes pretend we're the romantic depictions of angels, but i know this is not a literal truth.
(…)
I liked that expression/description of inner events. I also think You are right.
(09-25-2016, 04:33 PM)OpalE Wrote: (...)
Rather than an "awakening," i feel (more and more) that i'm collecting a deeper and somehow permanent knowledge of .. my own identity(?). This is a patient thing, not urgent (though it was VERY urgent in my teens/twenties).
(...)
May word/label/symbol “collecting” be replaced with “building” or “sculpturing” from the point of view of your Understanding / the way You approach Self/Other Self/Creation?
Literally a moment ago a thought approached me regarding your “two ways” situation.
Thought content: If you were a Wanderer of the Ra Social Memory Complex You might would have some issues with this Material. I have no idea what kind of issues though. Glitch-like maybe?
Welcome to the Forum.
All I have Best in me for You