Negative polarity.

[Matt1]

In living the Law of One 101 Carla gives three examples of negative polarity and three examples of positive polarity, Carla mentions that Adolf Hitler was one of the most well known examples of negative polarization. This makes fairly good sense as Hitler is normally considered to be the archetype of evil in the modern world. However what i find fairly strange is that Carla and Ra mention that Hitler wasn't successful in polarizing towards the negative. How on Earth can someone as negative as Hitler not reach the threshold of 95% service to self?

Here is a below quote

Unlike Genghis Khan, who did succeed in graduating in the

service-to-self polarity, Hitler did not. His negative polarity was

greatly weakened by his belief that he was “

doing the right thing

”

for his fatherland. He saw all the mass extermination as the needed

means to the end of saving Germany. He saw himself always as

Germany's savior.

I find this to be very interesting, in would suggest that the negative polarity must have consciousness knowledge that what they are doing is negative and wrong in order to polarized successfully and vice versa for the positive polarity. I find this makes sense logically in the positive polarity but in the sense of the negative polarity, i would have assumed that the negative entity would normally consider themselves to be good and correct doing what they sincerely believe to be the right thing? Perhaps the difference on a well known negative entity Rasputin would be his philosophy would be summed up as sinning as a means to reach salvation because if Christ is here to save the sinners, then those who sin the most will be saved first so long as they have faith. This would then be a conscious knowledge of wrong doing.