10-17-2010, 10:24 PM
(10-17-2010, 02:41 PM)peregrine Wrote: With all due respect, u., I don't think you have this quite in focus.
There are not and have never been three polarities. Essentially, those wishing to attain sufficient spiritual mass to travel upon path of returning to the unity of all may use one of two approaches. STS & STO have revealed themselves as the most relatively efficient means of using catalyst to that end. Somewhere around mid-6D these may be unified into a single approach which uses catalyst most efficiently. This, again, is a unified approach, NOT a third polarity.
thats a serious question. i dont have a clear cut answer to this. and this is why im discussing it.
we are told to have 2 polarities. and, we are told that at early 6th, these two polarities combine. and, ra says that as entities of late 6th d, they are continuing their work, unpolarized, without having polarity.
then we have polarity definitions. there is the service to self, which ignores and uses everything other than self, for self, and there is service to other, which ignores self and sacrifices it for the betterment of others.
now. if, polarities combine in early 6d, and there is not a 3rd, middle road polarity, then do the service to self go to service to other path ? we are told as such.
then how does Ra seek without polarity ... neither being for law of light, or law of love, but for love of one.
that is an important question that needs to be discussed deeply.
(10-16-2010, 01:59 AM)peregrine Wrote: How exactly should one do that?
i remember Ra saying that as many ways were found to penetrate the veil as the imagination of the entities incarnated into a veil. probably endless.
and every entity has different character, and probably spiritual background.
so then its probably left entirely to the person himself/herself. something they need to discover themselves. some go to mountains, talk to spirits, castenada style, some listen to music, some meditate, some talk with certain friends, some pray, some run amok ....
but i think, and i strongly believe that, every entity has their own pre-incarnational setup for guidance and navigation. ranging from guides to higher selves, inner plane entities, whatever they set up before.
Quote:(10-16-2010, 10:37 PM)unity100 Wrote: yes, this is a practical consideration. everyday life introduces too many imbalancing factors to an entity's violet. also, wear&tear. and situations differ for everyone. but what i think is, the reaction/solution should not be a knee jerk response to polarize. everyone should carefully listen to their own spirit, think, plan and live according to their own spiritual nature, balance and incarnational plans. and even then there will STILL be a lot of wear, tear and effects introduced to the person's violet. leading to tiredom, worn-outness, various conditions and issues.
I just can't understand, u., why you're so uptight about the balancing of a 6D being. This is their job. They're happy to do it. So what if takes another 100,000 years? What's that compared to millions? They say they're "out of time," so why worry about the wear & tear? More thorough balancing in 6D may conduce to less "time" doing so in a later density. I think you should lighten up and let the balances shift where ever they need to go. Otherwise, you're not in the game, you're skirting around the edges like a someone who's good at taking tests rather than someone who's truly engaged in the process.
the above wasnt about balancing work in 6d. violet balance is an important and valid factor in every density existence. its important to keep a minimum balance so that the entity can go forward with its existence. basically there is a limit to imbalance, even though every deviation from stillness, oneness, is an imbalance and distortion.
ie basically, if the violet balance goes WAY too imbalanced, the entity may go mad, become terminally sick, delirious, ineffectual, clueless, witless, senseless -> anything goes.
but the work of balance as a main target it seems, is the work of 6d. and i personally dont care if it took a billion years, or a trillion years. i am in the opinion that everything should take their due time, and not 'catalyzed' with anything, artificially. (veils this that).
peregrine Wrote:What do mean, "that should be an approach on its own?" I can't follow you there.
its the thing about the polarities, at the first quote block in this post.