09-23-2016, 03:30 PM
(09-22-2016, 10:22 AM)Ashim Wrote:(09-20-2016, 09:16 PM)Infinite Unity Wrote:No offence taken, in fact I like it when folks display passion. If it's not your thing then , of course, fine.(09-09-2016, 02:06 PM)Ashim Wrote:(09-09-2016, 01:32 PM)Infinite Unity Wrote: Hidden hand to me seems like an ordinary person who has done there Ra homework. I personally do not like the feeling get from hidden hand. I read some of her rhetoric on her being from s m c lucifer, and how Yahweh asked for help in his creation. When she spoke on Yahweh it was with obvious distain. It was pretty clear to me one of her main sources of information was the Ra Material. I don't like how she portays herself being of the bloodlines, and openly says she's a negative adept. Then a paragraph down will then flip to sto variations of material. So basically in my opinion of your interested in hidden hand, just skip to the source and read Ra. Everything else is her subjective view of what is. f*** all the channelings, and just follow your own path.
How about real critical thinking as aposed to whataboutism?
Discuss.
Quote: The entities have the concepts of lawful and taboo, but the law is inexorable and all events occur as predestined. There is no concept of right and wrong, good or bad. It is a culture in monochrome. In this context you may see the one you call Lucifer as the true light-bringer in that the knowledge of good and evil both precipitated the mind/body/spirits of this Logos from the Edenic conditions of constant contentment but also provided the impetus to move, to work and to learn.
I was giving a small over-view of what my personal opinion of hidden hand. Nothing more. With the f*** channeling part it seems I went a little far, and possibly offended some entities. I am sorry, this was not the aim of my intent. I associated her messages with the term rhetoric, in how she would present herself one way, and a paragraph down she would flip coins, this does not resonate with me. Some may take this as just a token. However for me it was a much larger red flag. I never once said she was wrong about lucifer, or her theory of lucifer. However when one further analyzes what is said, who truly are orions? are orions just lucifer playing this game? So in short her negative adept speeches and stories of bloodlines, dressed in sto decor, isnt my thing. Nothing more.
Just one question: what makes you think that H_H is female? I don't think that was mentioned in the postings.
Very good question, I have from the onset, of reading some of her material, felt she were female. I would agree that lucifer can be seen in an archetypical format, as "the light bringer." The darkness bringing, or elucidating upon the light. Reminds me alot of how things in conscience are actually quiet on the opposite foot, as the saying goes. However the way the Hidden hand speaks of lucifer, is in a manner of personal to this planetary logo's experience. Hidden hand does not specifically give the same information in terms of it being a wide-spread archtypical over arching this entire galactic logos, in terms that Ra did. However I see apart of what Ra says is almost like a retro-active effect taking place. As if the logos previously choosing not to pass down free will, are now experiencing it being intertwined with there creations.