Social behaviours.

[APeacefulWarrior]

Hopefully I'm not going off on too much of a tangent here, but awhile back my guides provided me with a very interesting lesson on the energetics behind conversations that seems relevant to this discussion.

They had been encouraging me to try to embrace more directly-energetic exchanges with them, rather than relying entirely on words, because words greatly lower the vibrational levels of such exchanges. This is something I'm still working on, as I have opportunity, since it's quite difficult for someone like me who's very verbally-oriented! Then one of my guides referred to simply beaming\sharing green-ray with each other as a "conversation."

Consider this a very loose translation of what followed, because it was mostly nonverbal:

I expressed confusion at using the word "conversation" to describe this, as I saw conversation as being an exchange of ideas, such as in a debate or dialectic. They responded with an animated ideogram of sorts, with several layers to it.

The bottom layer was like a flipbook, a pastiche or montage of the sort of everyday banter you're talking about here. "Hey, nice weather we're having, huh?" "Wow, did you see the football game last night?" "You're looking nice today! Did you change your hair?" That sort of thing, the sort of standard chit-chat most people fill up their days with.

On top of that was a demonstration of the energy exchange involved, and it basically looked like a game of Pong. Two "paddles" representing the participants, and a ball of energy bouncing between them in time with the flow of conversation. With each "hit" on a paddle, it vibrated a little more quickly. ie, absolutely regardless of the actual topic of discussion, it's a vehicle for sharing energies between two or more parties.

Then sort of parallel, another diagram, but this time with the two "paddles" and a single steady bi-directional stream of energy between them. This represented "discussion" as my guide was using it - cutting out the energetically-wasteful back and forth, and simply sharing the energies in a steady flow. And on top of that, an implication of sorts that this was illustrating a "perfected" conversation, at least in terms of energy-efficiency. The process of converting the energies into words is basically waste byproduct, like how it's impossible to convert electricity into visible light without also losing some energy to heat.

And the funny thing is, this was communicated to me successfully in just a second or two, whereas it's taken me several minutes to actually convert it into words - which just further reinforces the lesson.

At any rate, the relevance here (as I see it) is that while there is a mild "controlling" factor that accompanies any bit of banter, even something as simple as "Nice weather we're having, huh?" most conversations are simply a means of sharing and building energy between two "like-minded" entities. It is (among positive-leaning entities) a method of sharing love\light via yellow ray processes, but there's also still a block there, in that the conversation could be a much more efficient energy-exchange mechanism without having to go through the yellow-ray conversion.