World Orion Seek to Destroy Humanity?

[APeacefulWarrior]

Ok Peaceful, let me put it this way, you appear to be occuping somewhat raised if not higher moral ground. It is not your place to censor information to others. There are forum rules in place that deal with this. I really believe that you are concerned about the potential for damage that "tall tales" may cause, but I do not think that you should take up position as a self appointed guardian of the conspiracies. The "unwary and the unprepared" do not need you to contribute a bias. I would genuinly welcome a discussion based on the information that I linked too because I found it enlightening. I say nothing about it being 'truthful', as this, I believe, is the responsibility of the reader to pass judgement on.
To be honest this is a forum about similar information 'channeled through the ether' from space aliens claiming to come from venus and having built pyramids using "thought". I mean come on, how this 'conspiracy theory' differers from any of the stuff I posted is beyond me.

If you want to view me as being on higher moral ground, that's your choice - but I didn't say anything like that.  I was just speaking to one of my own perceived forms of service.  Nor did I say anything whatsoever about censorship or being a "guardian of the conspiracies" or nearly everything else you wrote!  Come on, man.  Are you doing this on purpose?  I'm having a hard time understanding why you seem incapable of replying to me without first rewriting my posts to say things I didn't. (Then accusing me of being aggressive based on it.)

I never said anything to the effect that someone shouldn't share their views.  Only that it would be wise to consider the overall impact their words might have.  

As for the necessity of contributing a bias, that's kind of an odd statement to make.  Every post in every thread ever is ultimately contributing a bias.  Everyone has the right as free entities to do so, for whatever reasons they choose.  One could just as easily question why you believe contributing your own biases is necessary.  But I won't, because -again- that's simply what discussion IS: A comparison of biases, none more necessary or not than any other.
   
But either way, if you are honestly unable to respond to me without turning everything I write into a strawman, I'm just not going to bother.  You're giving me absolutely no reason to try having an actual discussion with you.  It's becoming outright exhausting trying to disentangle my real words from what you imagine them to be.