10-14-2010, 02:14 PM
(10-14-2010, 12:05 PM)peregrine Wrote: I suspect that negation of polarity here is a false construction. RA is STS and is STO. They simply see these as the same thing through the prism of the LOO. In other words, other equals self because all of us, my brother, are simply distortions of the One Creatrix. [By the way, "Creatrix" is the feminine form of "Creator." I find it a touch softer and harbor a preference for that term.]
if two polarized charges combine, the polarity is negated. this is the way it is. 'simply seeing this' -> that is not a 'perspective' matter, or commentation matter. it is something that the entity has to manifest in all facets of its existence. it is not an abstract philosophical matter. it has to be manifested with actions and states of both mind, and the spirit. the laws you speak of are not just abstract concepts.
Quote:They don't actually use the terms, "light polarity" or "love polarity," now do they? They appear to be referring to the fact that they are not oriented to the Law of Love nor the Law of Wisdom, but to the Law of One.
and ?
difference ?
orienting according to law of love would entail positive polarity with green ray open, and orienting according to law of wisdom would entail negative polarity with green ray closed.
you seem to be just thinking that those 'laws' are just abstract, perspective concepts in perceiving things. you dont think that they have actual connotations for the way entity manifests itself.
Quote:It's too bad, U, that you aren't paying mind to the many specific quotes that other people are bringing up which refute your premise. That doesn't seem fair.
first, noone has brought any quote that refuted my premise, second, i am just choosing not to reply to quantum's posts, on grounds i have mentioned before in two other topics. as you see, i have responded to your 'refutation' as such.