Jade Wrote:I understand what you mean. My subsequent point is that just because you choose green, doesn't mean that red, blue, AND yellow necessarily cease to exist - green coexisting with red and blue might be a paradox, green coexisting with yellow may still be a possibility. Or maybe red and blue become purple and that vortex is available. In the quote Ra is talking about a very specific event - a harvest that did not occur for Maldek because they blew up their planet. I don't think all possibility/probability vortices are such an either/or.
You're right, in Maldek's case there was no other possibilities left except a new planet, which doesn't apply to our "fluid" lives where there are so many variables, influences and entities involved, so I'm with you on the other possibilities not necessarily ceasing abruptly like in Maldek's case, and new vortices forming (purple).
Jade Wrote:And you're right about imagining that trauma may not have happened as being a healing modality - however, I think around these parts we refer to that as "spiritual bypassing" - not using spiritual knowledge to actually engage in catalyst, but instead avoid it. If I negate all of the trauma in my past, then I lose that "progress" I made in coping with that catalyst.
Agreed again, I don't do that, I think I work intensively through catalyst. I was referring to ricdaw's example where "Seth describes how to (essentially) change your own personal past to achieve healings." My memory is a curse I tell ya, there's very little I forget. Albert Schweitzer said "happiness is good health and a bad memory". He-he... I wish I had a bad memory.
Jade Wrote:If I choose to forget a specific trauma that say, occurred between my mother and I, and in turn she also forgets that she perpetrated this trauma, doesn't the "consensus reality" of that event then change?
I don't think so, since it still happened. That both of you forgot, doesn't change what happened.