08-08-2016, 01:55 PM
I see duality as a mean to express a thought.
Oneness within void is unity but a unity of nothing whereas Oneness within distortions is infinity and a unity of that infinity. I would argue here that distortions are truth in a certain way, as they are an indissociable aspect of beingness and make beingness/oneness into something other than total void. So with your example of the snake, whether the snake sees it's tail as itself or not will simply change on what level unity is being perceived from within illusions. But within non-illusionary unity with no resistance nor distortions, there is no snake.
Everythingness is the false pole, it is the path of that which is not and englobes every sub-distortion. It is resistance to what is without illusions, it is resistance to one beingness in complete void. So love, light, time, space, etc are all illusions contained as potential of the idea of themselves within truth but remains the false pole as I see things.
Oneness within void is unity but a unity of nothing whereas Oneness within distortions is infinity and a unity of that infinity. I would argue here that distortions are truth in a certain way, as they are an indissociable aspect of beingness and make beingness/oneness into something other than total void. So with your example of the snake, whether the snake sees it's tail as itself or not will simply change on what level unity is being perceived from within illusions. But within non-illusionary unity with no resistance nor distortions, there is no snake.
Everythingness is the false pole, it is the path of that which is not and englobes every sub-distortion. It is resistance to what is without illusions, it is resistance to one beingness in complete void. So love, light, time, space, etc are all illusions contained as potential of the idea of themselves within truth but remains the false pole as I see things.