6D Wanderers: 3D Lessons?

[Aaron]

i dont associate polarizing with recklessness. however, polarizing, we know to be upsetting to an entity's balance in greater scheme of things, from Ra. (their comment about polarization being salvation of 3d despite it being imbalancing in the greater scheme of things).

No comprende, amigo. Isn't the ever deepening desire to serve the same force that compels polarization in 3D as well as balancing in 6D. In that sense it's all the same thing. I can't see how it would cause "imbalancing (sic) in the greater scheme of things."

Hi, peregrine. You put forward some very interesting ideas in this post, especially the idea that although the LOO material is in itself unpolarized, the intentions of the group made the action a positively polarizing one.

Here, though, I think I can help deepen your understanding. I believe Unity is right about polarization being an imbalanced move from the overall perspective. However, it is necessary at our point to polarize in order to progress up the spiral of consciousness.

We seek now without polarity. Thus we do not invoke any power from without, for our search has become internalized as we become light/love and love/light.

So, we can conclude that polarization is necessary in order to learn to become ultimately balanced. You have to make a move that is unbalancing to your overall beingness in order to finally learn balance.

I think you're very right about the deep desire to serve being the same driving force that compels us to polarize now as well as to seek unity later. The difference is in how you allow that driving force, or flow, to be directed through you to different actions or outcomes as you learn and grow through the densities.