RA Bugs ME!

[Steppingfeet]

If a child asks you a question like "why are people mean?"  would you respond with a complex rendering of the teachings of Freud, Jung and other psychological theorists? Or would you respond at a level the child could understand. I realize my example falls apart in that a child could not understand Freud and Jung, while an adult can (with work) understand Ra's cosmic theology.

Sometimes it just gets a little thick. I give Don great credit for patience in not at some moment saying "Will you just answer the question I asked in the relative consciousness in which it was asked instead of always going ABSOLUTE on me?"

As precise as Ra attempted to be in their replies, and as they attempted to operate within certain consistent parameters linked to free will, vital energy, psychic greeting, and so forth, there was still a great flexible art in the dynamic of the conversation. At times Ra would take the liberty of expounding on unasked questions and at other times be tight-lipped, not giving up further information until a query was articulated. At times Ra served up a reply without taking Don's questions literally, at other times they made him re-query the obvious because they took his first query so literally. (e.g.: Q: Can you tell me such and such? Ra: Yes. Q: Can you go ahead and do that please? [Bad paraphrasing.])

I think I've seen examples of what you describe, though. However, I would reserve criticism in this case. That's a really good analogy that works in a lot of ways. At the same time the human parent to child are much, much closer in experience than the sixth-density social memory complex to the third-density individual or (non-unified) group. The chasm is so vast that Ra could barely put their experience into words.

64.6 To speak of that which sixth-density social memory complexes labor within in order to advance is at best misprision of plain communication for much is lost in transmission of concept from density to density, and the discussion of sixth density is inevitably distorted greatly.

Consider their challenges:

• An advanced consciousness which does not use words ("sound vibration complexes") to communicate had to clothe their concepts in English, while manipulating the instrument's physical vocal chords to make sounds.
  
• Being who exist outside of our space and time had to transmit into our space and time and take both into account in their replies, not to mention pinpointing their narrow-band signal on one human being.
  
• Beings three dimensions or densities removed from our own had to cross the expanse of three dimensions of experience
  
• And the challenge that any two intelligent entities in creation face when encountering one another: understanding each other. They had the advantage of being able to "scan" Don's mind, and of seeing his vibratory rate, and knowing his soul history, and of reading his chakras, but still they were dealing with conscious incarnate entities experiencing an illusion, a veil, a forgetting, internal divisions, and separation between each other that is completely foreign to them.
  

I think that we can understand them at all speaks to the fact that they did speak at our level. Were we to somehow witness them telepathically sharing the same basic information with those of their own level of understanding, it would be literally incomprehensible to our brain-bound minds.

But, they also have abilities and resources beyond our wildest human imagination. And could, despite their best intentions, maybe be obtuse sometimes.