10-06-2010, 01:56 PM
I believe you are the one and avoiding certain concepts, despite they are the underlying concepts that create all these we talk about. therefore the discussion cannot come to the crux of the matter. its not about my 'lifestyle' either.
letting go of materialism, attachments is not a sign of 'attachment'. it is a universal concept for going towards higher densities. so much universal that, leave aside it being a universal concept among religions and spiritual philosophies of even this world alike (despite they have a lot in disagreement about a lot of other things), even the philosophies that follow negative path dont go near materialism and possessions. they concentrate on control of other individuals.
in short, yes, materialism, material possessions, attachment to these things, are things to be left behind, even if an entity is negative. 'denouncing' being 'attachment' is a proposition that baffles me.
henceforth, these determine the nature of 4d and on, especially positive. and, specifically, along with its sharing, and service to other traits, the definition of a 4d environment (and on) becomes, what we term as socialism, at this time and age.
- no materialism or material attachments
- no reliance on external objects or concepts for identification, definition and expression of one's own self
- sharing
- caring for others more than self
- acknowledging and valuing others' thoughts and feelings more than self
- accepting each and everyone without discrimination, equally
- giving more than you take
- sharing even thoughts, memories and feelings to the point of being one
the above traits, end up defining roughly what we know as 'socialism'. actually even further than that -> entities share, and see others' thoughts, memories and feelings as their own.
these are important. these are energetic, philosophical concepts that lie under EVERYthing related to this subject. 51% positive polarity is not just for show. its not an abstract concept either.
the practicality/impracticality of that concept in 3d, also hinge on the underlying base concepts.
.................
i have made remarks regarding 'impracticality' of socialism or 4d formats in 3d, in the above post. you can refer to those parts.
letting go of materialism, attachments is not a sign of 'attachment'. it is a universal concept for going towards higher densities. so much universal that, leave aside it being a universal concept among religions and spiritual philosophies of even this world alike (despite they have a lot in disagreement about a lot of other things), even the philosophies that follow negative path dont go near materialism and possessions. they concentrate on control of other individuals.
in short, yes, materialism, material possessions, attachment to these things, are things to be left behind, even if an entity is negative. 'denouncing' being 'attachment' is a proposition that baffles me.
henceforth, these determine the nature of 4d and on, especially positive. and, specifically, along with its sharing, and service to other traits, the definition of a 4d environment (and on) becomes, what we term as socialism, at this time and age.
- no materialism or material attachments
- no reliance on external objects or concepts for identification, definition and expression of one's own self
- sharing
- caring for others more than self
- acknowledging and valuing others' thoughts and feelings more than self
- accepting each and everyone without discrimination, equally
- giving more than you take
- sharing even thoughts, memories and feelings to the point of being one
the above traits, end up defining roughly what we know as 'socialism'. actually even further than that -> entities share, and see others' thoughts, memories and feelings as their own.
these are important. these are energetic, philosophical concepts that lie under EVERYthing related to this subject. 51% positive polarity is not just for show. its not an abstract concept either.
the practicality/impracticality of that concept in 3d, also hinge on the underlying base concepts.
.................
i have made remarks regarding 'impracticality' of socialism or 4d formats in 3d, in the above post. you can refer to those parts.