04-24-2016, 10:03 AM
Dear Sean Hsu,
In case, when Ra Him/Her/It/Them-Self/Selves asked for correction, it might be done, but I guess Don/Carla/Jim Complex made Their own decision to left things as they were with all that follows – i.e. clarification made by Ra.
I agree with your remark, that if things are not corrected right away but are explained in next session for example (or ‘later’), than there may be added a note/comment pointing this out. But I think that’s it. No other alterations should be made.
I also think that it is not an amount / number of Other-Selves that matters in such conversation, but the arguments that are layed/laid out.
Knowing that such alterations will be most likely done, I’m glad I possess the original “Law of One” books which I will be reading in the future – not “latest edition” that has been “corrected”.
All I have Best in me for You
In case, when Ra Him/Her/It/Them-Self/Selves asked for correction, it might be done, but I guess Don/Carla/Jim Complex made Their own decision to left things as they were with all that follows – i.e. clarification made by Ra.
I agree with your remark, that if things are not corrected right away but are explained in next session for example (or ‘later’), than there may be added a note/comment pointing this out. But I think that’s it. No other alterations should be made.
I also think that it is not an amount / number of Other-Selves that matters in such conversation, but the arguments that are layed/laid out.
Knowing that such alterations will be most likely done, I’m glad I possess the original “Law of One” books which I will be reading in the future – not “latest edition” that has been “corrected”.
All I have Best in me for You