04-17-2016, 05:55 PM
Hello Dear Rolci,
Firstly, I think there are quite astonishing consequences regarding the answer about first three densities.
1st – 17%
2nd – 20%
3rd – 27%
- as I understand it, there are planets with third density Entities where there’s no one of the previous densities (!) So, there may be planets with third density Beings where there are no animals nor trees. On the second thought is it possible to exist on the planet, where there’s no first density at all? What animals would eat? (for example). But than again – planets with first density Beings are less than planets with second density Beings on it. This is truly confusing. I understand that there may be third density beings so technologically highly evolved that they could live on “dead rock” planet and cover their needs with the technology. But again – why would they, if they were so highly advanced? What kind of life would that be?
For me personally those numbers are very strange.
Second issue – when You add up all the percentages given for 1 – 5 densities, You get 86%. It would suggest that 6 and 7 density lies within 14%. But than there’s information of 35% of “intelligent planets” – BUT this value do not correspond with previously given number of 67 000 000 – I think it is the percentage of ALL planets within Our Galaxy. Since 67 millions is only a fraction of all planets within this Galaxy, none of those “35% intelligent planets” may be included within given number of planets with densities being present on them.
Furthermore, RA said that “These are mysteries of a sixth and seventh densities” – therefore I think that both of those densities are included in both:
1. 14% left
2. 35% of “intelligent planets”.
I realize that there are things that We are simply unable to comprehend and We are filtering this information through Our limited possibilities of understanding / categorization. I think that there are “Beings” that would never be acknowledge by Us as “Beings” – they differ from Us so much (from Our understanding of what “Being” is) that they are too “alien” for Us to even perceive them / to include their nature in Our thought-process.
Thought about “percentile take” – to express something in such manner, things/objects/Beings must be separate. Maybe sixth and seventh densities are interwoven in such way that they are “crossing/merging Them-Selves” – to express it within Our, three-dimensional category – something may be up, down, on the left, right, in front of, behind something – or – one may cross / merge with another. In Our reality this last case would suggest “modification” of the crossing/merging objects/Beings – maybe in highest densities it is not the case.
All I have Best in me for You
(04-15-2016, 07:21 PM)Rolci Wrote: Ra: I am Ra. A percentage seventeen for first density, a percentage twenty for second density, a percentage twenty-seven for third density, a percentage sixteen for fourth density, a percentage six for fifth density. The other information must be withheld. The free will of your future is not making this available. We shall speak on one item. There is a fairly large percentage, approximately thirty-five percent of the intelligent planets, which do not fit in the percentiles. These mysteries are of sixth and seventh density and are not available for our speaking.
Firstly, I think there are quite astonishing consequences regarding the answer about first three densities.
1st – 17%
2nd – 20%
3rd – 27%
- as I understand it, there are planets with third density Entities where there’s no one of the previous densities (!) So, there may be planets with third density Beings where there are no animals nor trees. On the second thought is it possible to exist on the planet, where there’s no first density at all? What animals would eat? (for example). But than again – planets with first density Beings are less than planets with second density Beings on it. This is truly confusing. I understand that there may be third density beings so technologically highly evolved that they could live on “dead rock” planet and cover their needs with the technology. But again – why would they, if they were so highly advanced? What kind of life would that be?
For me personally those numbers are very strange.
Second issue – when You add up all the percentages given for 1 – 5 densities, You get 86%. It would suggest that 6 and 7 density lies within 14%. But than there’s information of 35% of “intelligent planets” – BUT this value do not correspond with previously given number of 67 000 000 – I think it is the percentage of ALL planets within Our Galaxy. Since 67 millions is only a fraction of all planets within this Galaxy, none of those “35% intelligent planets” may be included within given number of planets with densities being present on them.
Furthermore, RA said that “These are mysteries of a sixth and seventh densities” – therefore I think that both of those densities are included in both:
1. 14% left
2. 35% of “intelligent planets”.
I realize that there are things that We are simply unable to comprehend and We are filtering this information through Our limited possibilities of understanding / categorization. I think that there are “Beings” that would never be acknowledge by Us as “Beings” – they differ from Us so much (from Our understanding of what “Being” is) that they are too “alien” for Us to even perceive them / to include their nature in Our thought-process.
Thought about “percentile take” – to express something in such manner, things/objects/Beings must be separate. Maybe sixth and seventh densities are interwoven in such way that they are “crossing/merging Them-Selves” – to express it within Our, three-dimensional category – something may be up, down, on the left, right, in front of, behind something – or – one may cross / merge with another. In Our reality this last case would suggest “modification” of the crossing/merging objects/Beings – maybe in highest densities it is not the case.
All I have Best in me for You