04-17-2016, 12:14 AM
I agree that there is a semantic issue with the limitations of the English language however I also like to peruse the thought that Ra is aware of this limitation and so uses words which approach the concepts as closely as possible. Thus I think when Ra used the word "incarnation" it was actually referring to a more basic mechanic which we simply do not have terminology for but I feel that although time/space is invisible to us here in space/time, it is not invisible to itself and it is just as complex as space/time, as Ra says.
However, it seems that one can only move in to space/time from the adjacent time/space. We do not have any words to describe the difference between adjacent movement of the entity from time/space to space time and the movement of the entity from a higher density time/space in to a lower density time/space, but I can conceive of both of these under the guise of the word "incarnation".
However, it seems that one can only move in to space/time from the adjacent time/space. We do not have any words to describe the difference between adjacent movement of the entity from time/space to space time and the movement of the entity from a higher density time/space in to a lower density time/space, but I can conceive of both of these under the guise of the word "incarnation".