Incarnative Process

[Parsons]

(I haven't read every post; apologies for redundancy if someone posted similar thoughts)

I think in the first quotes you provided (session 21) where Ra is referring to the Maldek entities incarnate in 3rd density time/space, they are using the word "incarnate" because no word exists for the concept they are referring to. The body incarnate is not a chemical complex, but a different type of body that is incarnate in time/space.

I believe this is the same problem they have when referring to other concepts that the various Earth languages just don't have words for. To use a tired analogy, it's like trying to explain to someone who has never seen or heard of snow before what snow is. Or trying to describe what the color blue looks like to someone who has never seen that color before.

To phrase this another way, they are using the word incarnate for both space/time and time/space when really there should be a different word for incarnation into time/space. While they may be different concepts, they are similar enough from Ra's perspective to just substitute the word "incarnate" for both.

I view time/space or inner planes of 3rd density (and probably all other densities) as a sort of "hopper" (or "dugout" to borrow a baseball analogy) of the 'actual' of 3rd density, which is space/time. The spirit/mind complex still needs a focus (body) to sort things out, so it incarnates a body in time/space. Once it get's stuff sorted out (ie, what kind of major catalyst it needs), it incarnates into a space/time chemical 3D vehicle.