Incarnative Process

[Illamasqua]

Hmm, so is that to say that in time/space there is no body or just no chemical body?

That depends on what your definition for "body" is. Generally speaking, a body is an organized/organic form (hence, organism) of a physical nature capable of metabolic and reproductive processes/functions. For example, early 2D unicellular microbes/biota such as the volvox or the radiolarians:





It is obvious that densities 2 through 6 utilize some sort of physical (space/time) body, from "chemical" to "light" (which are just the same, really—one just has to look into a microcosope as shown above to realize how the lines blur between "solid" matter and "subtle"). Now, whether 1D and 7D utilize some bodily structure is entirely debatable: both are of a formless/amorphous constitution without the need to feed (metabolize) or reproduce (sex). And as far as we can tell, these functions carry over all the way into 6th density as 6D entities still require to feed their vehicles (even if by merely "absorbing" light) and engage in sexual activities (i.e. "complete sexual fusion").

As to the "bodily" nature of time/space, we once again reach semantic difficulties. Based upon both first-hand personal experience and extensive study on third-party case reports (primarily from Robert Crookall, Sylvan Muldoon, Oliver Fox and others authors/researchers during the early 20th century—modern authors/researchers are much more "questionable" and not nearly as deep/careful as one may like), it is hard to say whether one has a "body" or not, since the time/space experience may fall under a multitude of categories:

• Some will describe an exact duplicate of their current/recent physical vehicle (with clothes and all! Who would have guessed you take your clothes with ya?!).
  
  
• Others will describe taking the shape of a more amorphous semi-luminous mist/fog with vague anthropomorphic features.
  
  
• Some others will describe taking the form of a ball of light or teardrop anywhere between the size of an orange and a watermelon.
  
  
• Yet others will describe no perceivable body at whilst having 360 degree vision.
  
  
• And to make matters even more interesting, others will describe an unclear mixture of the above!
  

So which one is it? In fact, are the above descriptions representative of a body... or the discarnate/disembodied mind? What about the spirit?

What is clear is that there is such a thing as a physical (space/time) body. Whether we call the time/space being a "body" is, quite unfortunately, open to interpretation due to the semantic complications of this verbal/lingual means of communication.