10-01-2010, 07:27 PM
(10-01-2010, 03:38 PM)Quantum Wrote: I see. And given I assumed you would have an answer readily available, I availed myself to the task of suggesting in my above post the scenario first, as a thought experiment, by taking these two wanderers out of a negative harvest, and rather hypothetically place them into a positive harvest instead, by suggesting that presumably had these 5D STO positive Wanderers depolarized slightly, but remained STO, they may have instead graduated into 4D positive, rather than remain at 3D. In this case being negative would have nothing to do with your response if they graduated positive. They would have Harvested from 3D positive to 4D positive. As always, I remain as curious to your responses.
a hypothetical situation, is hypothetical.
as we know from Ra, there is one 3d harvest, negative and positive entities are harvested in the same manner and fashion. their polarity defines their orientation.
as for hypothetical analysis, i already have posted my view on this, just a few posts above. when a wanderer which havent changed its polarity dies, it would still maintain the polarity and vibration of its own natural density.
the key is not being negative or positive, it is having changed polarity, nullified their polarity and then increased it in the other direction.
similarly, it can be said that if a negative wanderer nullified its polarity, and then went positive, they would probably also get harvested and subject to harvest.
Quote:unity Wrote:actually, telling these entities wanderers is a bit off placeIt is as interesting to note that you are assisting Ra, as well as all of us here at B4th, for which I'm sure there might be some who surely thank you and support you, for clearing up any confusion that the Ra Social Memory Complex may have created, this by making it clearer that their naming these two as STO Wanderers from 5D might have been an error on their part.
i sense veiled sarcasm in the above block ....
can you call an entity which gone negative in polarity to the extent of being negatively harvestable, a STO wanderer from 5d ? the term 'STO' there, would be a bit off place, wouldnt it.