03-04-2016, 12:13 AM
(03-03-2016, 11:29 PM)Minyatur Wrote: Pretty much what I said, all is love/light and light/love however you want to define it. The main problem with your perspective is that you try to define it as otherwise.
I actually never said that anything in particular was not love/light or light/love, let alone negative polarity. But we have to get specific when talking about those terms, and "love-light" is not the same as "green ray" love. One is more of a creative force, whereas the other is compassion. And I have no problem with those quotes you shared. But earlier it seemed like you had a problem with the quotes where Ra directly stated the negative path was more dependent on illusion. So which is it? Do you agree with Ra or not? You can't quote them as truth, and then deny it the next second. Otherwise, you are just cherry picking ideas and inventing your own philosophy.
"The polarities are both dependent upon a limited viewpoint. However, the negative polarity depends more heavily upon the illusory separation betwixt the self and all other mind/body/spirit complexes."