(03-03-2016, 04:36 PM)Minyatur Wrote: If Ra calls it the path of that which is not, it seems more to hint that Ra as a whole hasn't fully distilled the mirror it is unto itself. What is is what we all are.
Because we know better than a bagillion year old social memory complex that has probably had more experience with negative beings than we will our entire earthly lives?
Are you saying you know more about a concept that was explicated and brought up by Ra in the first place, without which, none of us would even know about this concept in the first place?
The "path of separation" is called the "path of that which is not" because separation isn't real. STO denies the separation, STS affirms the separation. I don't see the problem or why such revulsion to it being called the path of that which is not.