02-17-2016, 03:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2016, 03:32 PM by APeacefulWarrior.)
It's worth mentioning that this is one of those oddball responses that isn't prefixed by "I am Ra." Not that we'll ever know for certain, but there's been some speculation those without the ID may be distorted, even interfered-with, and potentially not reliable. I'd tend to think that's even more likely in this particular case, since we know from later sessions that Ra had a hard time talking about highly-transient matters like the behaviors of human governments and "conspiracy theory" style material.
Just something to consider.
And as far as polarization goes, I think Ra intended to specify positively-polarized. Because it's not just a matter of willpower. As I understand it, a heavily-positive entity is actively radiating Green Ray\Love to everything around it, and that's pretty much kryptonite to heavily-negative entities. It can actively repel them in pretty much the same way as magnets can repel each other. Or, alternately, just being exposed to it can be depolarizing for less strongly-polarized negatives.
(And vice versa, if it's a weakly-polarized pos near to a strongly-polarized neg.)
Simply being polarized positively to a sufficient extent should be enough to render a person nearly immune to overt negative interference (or, again, vice-versa) except in the most totally unusual of circumstances. The repulsion effect would be great enough to make it nearly impossible for them to even exchange enough information\energy to interact in any significant way.
Just something to consider.
And as far as polarization goes, I think Ra intended to specify positively-polarized. Because it's not just a matter of willpower. As I understand it, a heavily-positive entity is actively radiating Green Ray\Love to everything around it, and that's pretty much kryptonite to heavily-negative entities. It can actively repel them in pretty much the same way as magnets can repel each other. Or, alternately, just being exposed to it can be depolarizing for less strongly-polarized negatives.
(And vice versa, if it's a weakly-polarized pos near to a strongly-polarized neg.)
Simply being polarized positively to a sufficient extent should be enough to render a person nearly immune to overt negative interference (or, again, vice-versa) except in the most totally unusual of circumstances. The repulsion effect would be great enough to make it nearly impossible for them to even exchange enough information\energy to interact in any significant way.