This is not a density of knowing

[Jade]

Yes. I see. Thank you for the efforts. I really feel like this: "to the unveiled creator a veiled life is insanity." There is another question I am not sure how to answer myself because I find myself in a tough position. I share deep stuff regularly on Facebook, often practical and sometimes impractical, sometimes influenced by Ra Material but mainly coming from my Infinite Essence. There are those who are active in 'following' me and my posts. So does the sharing of such informations violate their free will? Is it wise to stop posting those super deep things? When I have posted those things, I have gained some reputation for it and with that, many people have asked me for my guidance. In my understanding, all that you ever need appears before you in one way or another. That is to say when I was ready, the catalyst for being able to offer wisdoms and share my compassion for other selves were produced for me and them in reciprocity. So it is a great thing that causality lead me to these situations, but am I still infringing on their free will because sometimes it feels like I am discovering for them rather than letting them discover for themselves. Although I like the medium of Facebook because one has the choice to either read the post or not read it. Do you have any ideas on this? I really appreciate all the effort and energy you offer to write verbose and elaborated texts. Thank you.

It's very hard for another 3D entity to infringe upon the freewill of another incarnated entity just by dispassionately sharing information. Sharing information leading to infringement is what happens when a higher entity gives information that they have from a vantage point that we can't see. Like, Ra telling the group about their past life details would have been infringing upon them. Going to a past-life reader and having them tell you your past lives in not infringement - we don't all inherently trust and believe other 3D entities like we trust and believe 4D+ positive entities.

Nobody discovers spirituality through a meme on Facebook. All you are doing is adding to their layers of experience building up to when they decide to open the door. If people have learned to see you as someone wise or someone that they can trust, that is great. I would not worry that what you are doing is wrong. It would be one thing if you were going to other people's pages and sharing things directly on their page, or sending them messages like "Have you heard the message of Ra??" You are basically just background noise to them as they mindlessly scroll through their feed. If something you say or share jumps out at them and resonates, you are just acting as a messenger on their behalf, but it is not infringement. We are all woken up in little increments by others. Inspiring people is a good thing. I guess if people come to you for guidance, and you do then start pushing the Law of One as gospel, I think that too would be infringing, but I doubt you would do that. Again, the dispassionate sharing of information is the key - nonattachment to the outcome. When you start trying to actively convince someone of something that they just don't even want to hear (or are gullible/desperate enough to eat it all up) - that's when the infringement line gets crossed in that situation.

17.2 Questioner: Is it possible to help an entity to reach fourth-density level in these last days?


Ra: I am Ra. It is impossible to help another being directly. It is only possible to make catalyst available in whatever form, the most important being the radiation of realization of oneness with the Creator from the self, less important being information such as we share with you.

We, ourselves, do not feel an urgency for this information to be widely disseminated. It is enough that we have made it available to three, four, or five. This is extremely ample reward, for if one of these obtains fourth-density understanding due to this catalyst then we shall have fulfilled the Law of One in the distortion of service.

We encourage a dispassionate attempt to share information without concern for numbers or quick growth among others. That you attempt to make this information available is, in your term, your service. The attempt, if it reaches one, reaches all.

We cannot offer shortcuts to enlightenment. Enlightenment is of the moment, is an opening to intelligent infinity. It can only be accomplished by the self, for the self. Another self cannot teach/learn enlightenment, but only teach/learn information, inspiration, or a sharing of love, of mystery, of the unknown that makes the other-self reach out and begin the seeking process that ends in a moment, but who can know when an entity will open the gate to the present?