01-11-2016, 06:00 PM
Gary says
Gary, I do get where you're coming from. I've worked with a variety of Wanderers and students in general who have very different styles of thinking and belief systems. This enables flexible and adaptable thinking to take place -- as it will when I take on the 3 college grads in the Q&A script project.
Working with Wandereres and students came from doing numerous astrology consults and from high school teaching, and both are good training for understanding and relating to other's POV.
If people here are Wanderers -- 4D, 5D, 6D -- then I don't get why they are so in awe of the Ra group's words and don't think they themselves (esp those of 6D) have anything useful to add. I think there are some very talented & philosophically creative Wanderers who have something to offer.
As I've said, the Ra group are like a very good college professor, but in Ra's Fundamental Postulates I've pointed out that they are not flawless and the channel transmission is not flawless.
Ra's Fundamental Postulates
http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=10871
I don't see what is so hard to understand there and why LOO veterans can't respond. It's pretty cut and dry. Maybe there is some emotional block to not being able to critique a revered college professor's works.
As an analogy, Dewey Larson was highly revered but his ideas were still somewhat flawed and incomplete and the Nehru & Peret duo respectfully critiqued and improved on Dewey's work.
That's where I'm coming from and I realize that certain types of Wanderers do not resonate and that's fine. This work is directed towards the intellectual 4D types ie the philosophy grad students who are versed in science and philosophy of a more academic nature.
I appreciate your participation and we all share the thought that "it's all a journey".
Quote:I must say, though, that our minds are vibrating at very different wavelengths. Likely due to my own limitations and humbleness of cognition, I didn't understand a great deal of what you were saying.
Like Ankh, however, I do look forward to seeing what if any sort of introduction to this philosophy you are able to produce.
Gary, I do get where you're coming from. I've worked with a variety of Wanderers and students in general who have very different styles of thinking and belief systems. This enables flexible and adaptable thinking to take place -- as it will when I take on the 3 college grads in the Q&A script project.
Working with Wandereres and students came from doing numerous astrology consults and from high school teaching, and both are good training for understanding and relating to other's POV.
If people here are Wanderers -- 4D, 5D, 6D -- then I don't get why they are so in awe of the Ra group's words and don't think they themselves (esp those of 6D) have anything useful to add. I think there are some very talented & philosophically creative Wanderers who have something to offer.
As I've said, the Ra group are like a very good college professor, but in Ra's Fundamental Postulates I've pointed out that they are not flawless and the channel transmission is not flawless.
Ra's Fundamental Postulates
http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=10871
I don't see what is so hard to understand there and why LOO veterans can't respond. It's pretty cut and dry. Maybe there is some emotional block to not being able to critique a revered college professor's works.
As an analogy, Dewey Larson was highly revered but his ideas were still somewhat flawed and incomplete and the Nehru & Peret duo respectfully critiqued and improved on Dewey's work.
That's where I'm coming from and I realize that certain types of Wanderers do not resonate and that's fine. This work is directed towards the intellectual 4D types ie the philosophy grad students who are versed in science and philosophy of a more academic nature.
I appreciate your participation and we all share the thought that "it's all a journey".