The political correctness of Ra and the Confederation

[Night Owl]

We say the same basic content only I could not succeed at describing myself experiencing oneness with how some of the words are used. The way it is said is as important as the content itself. For instance Ra isn't beyond polarity. He is aware of the illusion of the polarity not beyond it. That's different and has a huge impact on the perspective you give to the Law of One. It is not a bible or absolute. It is a fractal perspective of the creator just as much as any of us and comes with it's own distortions while also having some of the host's distortions. Ra doesn't give really much info about the STS path except for the relation it has with polarization. But the thing with STS is that they will create evil (or service to themselves) in the experience. But the higher self is out of here and is the one really giving a service to all. While a STO entity serves the all here but serves also itself out of here. You cannot help others without doing it for your own good as well. Serving yourself is what brings experience to the all. Each polarity is a mirror to each other. Creation and destruction is one single process and needs both side of it to create. There is no creation without destruction. Destruction is what brings change, potential, improvements and perfection. The very foundation of time and multiplicity comes from destruction. STO are doing the creation work but they have no playground without STS. So yes STS provides a big service to the creation in every ways. Creation needs a resisting force in order to create upon it. Thats how the creator creates new potential infinitly. You do understand how oneness works really well but accepting STS as really equal in EVERY WAY as STO is necessary to experience oneness. An STS entity may create division outside of itself but it is trying to create oneness inside itself. STO creates oneness outside of them and creates division inside of them (breaking of the ego). That is necessary to understand to experience oneness which the only thing I'm truly adding to your approach to oneness. Experiencing instead of understanding.