11-13-2015, 11:13 AM
I meant it more in term of the passing down of free will through the veiling process, which of course is an extension of what you have stated and is to create a more vivid experience of Creator by Creator.
I see it as unconditional love because the Logos allows sub-Logoi to distort themselves unlike what it is itself. Prior to the veiling experiment, I'd say sub-Logoi could only be a harmonized reflection of the Logos which did not offer intense experiences for the Creator of Himself. As such through the passing down of free will we are allowed to create our own experience to our likings.
I think it is interesting to note that the veil created the possibility of the service to self polarity, yet this polarity extends far beyond the veiled experience.
Quote:79.27 Questioner: I was just wondering since this seems to be the crux of the experiment— this seems to be the large breaking point between no extension of the first distortion and the extension of the first distortion— what the result of this original experiment was with respect to that which was created from it. What was the result of that?
Ra: I am Ra. This is previously covered material. The result of these experiments has been a more vivid, varied, and intense experience of Creator by Creator.
I see it as unconditional love because the Logos allows sub-Logoi to distort themselves unlike what it is itself. Prior to the veiling experiment, I'd say sub-Logoi could only be a harmonized reflection of the Logos which did not offer intense experiences for the Creator of Himself. As such through the passing down of free will we are allowed to create our own experience to our likings.
I think it is interesting to note that the veil created the possibility of the service to self polarity, yet this polarity extends far beyond the veiled experience.