11-10-2015, 11:14 PM
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 1. Increasing the planet's vibration is acceptable to you? But that IS changing it.Everything is acceptable and everything is the byproduct of beingness, to reject something is to reject everything because everything also equally is that one thing you reject. That also is acceptable as else there would be no learning happening. Ultimately just as any paradox, this will be resolved in each awareness.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 2. I agree with Jade that what Q'uo really meant was that the way to change the world is by loving it. Love transforms.
All things will heal in love. But increasing the planet's vibration will not erase everything that was there, most of it will simply move elsewhere. Change is inevitable in the clashing of beingness, it is the very purpose of many-ness.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 3. However action and choice are also important, to direct that love.I never denied constantly making choices everyday, I simply said that the choices of each is personal to each and what is applicable to one is not to another. We're all exploring being a unique blend of distortions, as such the expression of self can only differ from one to another.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 4. I don't exactly disagree with what you said, but you have it a bit skewed, in my opinion. You continue to leave out the power of choice.
I never said you choices were bad, I simply stated that mine or any other are also not bad despite understanding how easily they often can be perceived as such. I do believe the root of all things to be love, the role of each being is to act upon how this undistorted universal love is filtered through itself.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 5. The power is in the resolution of paradox. One can love the STS actions/entities and yet, simultaneously, decline their service and consciously choose to transform them.Surely, but I belive one of the challenges of the STO is to do this without amplifying this very darkness they are trying to heal. Light does cast shadows.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 6. You left out polarity. Yes, I know, you explained that you don't resonate with the concept of polarity. That's fine, but please understand that the concept of polarity is a VERY BIG part of Ra's teachings, so if you are going to exclude it, there's no way you will understand, no matter how much I explain it.It is not that I do not resonate with the concept of polarity, I view everything as polarized. It is that I view all blendings of polarity to be rightful and that together they form something which is greater than the duality of polarity. I myself, am not exempt from my own polarity and need to work with it like any other being that exist temporarily within this Creation. I've put much emphasis on that upon the opening of the heart a different expression of universal love can be made and not that love must not be shared.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 7. You speak of unity, but leaving out a major concept isn't unity.I do not think I am leaving any concepts out. Like I said I do not see my view as being dissonant with the Ra material in it's whole.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 8. You speak of acceptance, but apathy isn't acceptance.I do agree with that, remains that the perfectly balanced entity will only feel love. To hold on to feelings which are "not" love is to hold on to distortions of this love. Undistorted love rejects not but can be rejected.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 9. You speak of being beyond polarity, but the sinkhole of indifference is before polarity, not beyond it.You state that I am indifferent, I may have considered it true in the past but I am only waking up more and more to awareness that the core of my being is everything but indifferent. Nothing is ever forgotten, no connection I have created with other-selves will ever be loss. I'm simply the kind of person that thinks about the possibility that the souls of the very animals we talk about or that I may have come to eat in one of their many 2D forms (or perhaps more them one over many lifetimes), may one day review our exchanges on this forum. Rather than indifferent, I'd say I am not very grounded more than anything.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 10. You speak of 'loving the world fully' but that would, by necessity, include loving the victims too, and if you love the victims and they are calling out for help, then the appropriate response is to answer their call. Yet you continually say that there's No need to answer their call. This tells me that you don't really grasp what love is. It sounds cool to say "love everything/everyone" but without service, that isn't love; it's indifference.There are infinite calls that are to be answered and infinite calls that are to be denied that service. I do believe souls attract the right entities to provide the right experiences.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 11. And yes, loving everything includes loving the victimizers as well. However, loving them doesn't necessitate accepting their offer for STS service. Nor does it require being a victimizer yourself.It effectively does not require any of that. I never intended to tell you that you should eat meat.
If I had to think a of a reason for which you could eat meat, that would be to try to perceive the meat as an entity of it's own and the Creator and to love it despite how it came to be. I do believe flesh wants to be flesh and not to rot away. This could be done in a way that would ensure that no animals suffered in the process, like something that would be thrown to rot if not eaten.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 12. If one wishes to answer the call of the victimizer, the first obvious step is to quit victimizing them.I believe that one can only perceive victims if it sees itself as a victim, your perception of others is but a mirror unto a perception of yourself. My perception of others is also a mirror of my perception of myself.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 13. Talking about 'loving everyone and everything' falls flat when one is still engaged in conscious victimizing of others.This works in an oppressor/victim mentality, when both are seen as one then this can only be perceived as a paradox. Like I said the doer and receiver are both one in themselves.
(11-10-2015, 10:26 PM)Monica Wrote: 14. You seem to be implying that a 'perfectly balanced entity' wouldn't answer the call of others, yet Ra answered not only our call, but the call of higher 2D entities.We all have our calls and I do answer calls. A call not being answered is an experience that was desired. While you are here on this planet, there are many other worlds where you could have helped other entities. It all boils down to a matter of resonance.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)