11-07-2015, 03:25 PM
This is an entertaining fencing match. It's much easier for me to see the dynamic going on not being involved. I really see how each is doing their best to convey themselves accurately and it is both amusing and somewhat disheartening to realize that there is no true chance for understanding because the fundamental philosophy of each is so different that they are sheerly incompatible. Yet, each carries on and yet also seems to care about the philosophy of the other but with a different kind of conceptual concern.
It makes me wonder what the function of this dynamic is, with each offering catalyst and each rejecting some and accepting some. Would be cool to see the 'polarization dynamics' of this conversation. I bet it wouldn't match what any individual thought but be a combined spectrum of everyone's expectations.
It makes me wonder what the function of this dynamic is, with each offering catalyst and each rejecting some and accepting some. Would be cool to see the 'polarization dynamics' of this conversation. I bet it wouldn't match what any individual thought but be a combined spectrum of everyone's expectations.