"good works for the wrong reasons"

[Shemaya]

Truth is subjective. Interesting.

It is interesting to me too IGW.  I think truth just is.  I think it may be perceived from different angles and viewpoints, but I would wholeheartedly disagree with the statement, "Truth is subjective."

APeacefulWarrior, I will respectfully bow out of this conversation.  I disagreed with you earlier in the thread and I still disagree with you. 

However I want to defend my point of view without lengthy explanation.

 Nowhere in the Ra Materials does Ra speak of the Creator EVER rejecting any aspect of Creation, nor of being directly Wrathful (or any synonym) towards any part of it. 

That might be true about Ra.  However, you have misconstrued what I have said. 

Ra said that there is no objective Right or Wrong, yet you continually speak of True and False as though they are objectively concrete things.   Truths and falsehoods are subjective, not objective. Both polarities are equally sincere in their desire to share their versions of the truth, and to bring other entities over to their way of thinking.

Well, I think truth is absolute, so we disagree. 

I give you examples of STO entities practicing non-violence and embracing total love, but you say you hope people "stand up to their oppressors in a spirit of righteous anger" and suggest that they should allow themselves to de-polarize for the sake of this struggle you hope to see. You're saying you want people to be less loving for the sake of your goals.

All I want to see is a New Earth free of oppression and violence, a 4D positive earth.  Don't you?

Ra speaks of Unity being EVERYTHING, full stop, without exception.  You advocate for forcible separation even though separation is a distortion.  And remember, this discussion started with the question of what 6D/7D Unity entails, and you rejected the idea that Unity involves the embrace and blending of both polarities. Now you're arguing for a separation which seems to be the exact opposite of Unity.

I think the discussion was "good works for the right reasons", so we are bit off at this point.  I said nothing about "forcible separation".  You have kind of misconstrued what I've said, and are not understanding my point of view, so I will bow out of this conversation between you and I.