The Polarity of Non-Duality

[spero]

If you look at the conditions for positive harvest, it's a minimum of 51% STO and 49% STS. By these percentages alone u can see that a positively oriented entity is actually expressing non-duality (slight STO bias). Its therefore no wonder that positively oriented entities find the extreme focus on STO detrimental since if 51% STO is as hard to reach as 95% STS then most entities trying to polarize positively should in fact be striving towards this 50:50 mix rather than the assumed total STO the idea of polarity seems to imply. I believe this is where the primary confusion comes in regarding polarity and why positives generally espouse a preference for non-duality or service-to-all since it ultimately amounts to the requisites for STO polarization and graduation anyway.

17.31
Questioner: Thank you very much. I don’t wish to take up extra time by asking questions over again. Some are so important I try to ask some similar questions in different ways to expand on the answer. Seems to be [inaudible] what we’re getting at, maybe not.
In the book Oahspe it states that if an individual is more than fifty percent for others— that is, goes over the 50% service to others, and is less than fifty percent for service to self, then he is harvestable. Is this a correct statement?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct if the harvesting is to be for the positive fourth dimensional level.