Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19)

    Thread: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19)


    Parsons (Offline)

    Citizen of Eternity
    Posts: 2,857
    Threads: 84
    Joined: Nov 2011
    #22
    09-29-2015, 04:05 PM (This post was last modified: 09-29-2015, 05:02 PM by Parsons.)
    I find it interesting that Ra / the Confederation even contacted Eisenhower in the first place. The way they word their response in 24.19, they were seeing if he was open to releasing the presence of the Confederation to the public:

    Quote:We, the Confederation, wished to see what would occur if this extremely positively oriented and simple congenial person with no significant distortions towards power happened across peaceful information and the possibilities which might append therefrom. We discovered that this entity did not feel that those under his care could deal with the concepts of other beings and other philosophies.

    Edit: Apparently that was not infringement, otherwise how did they even contact Eisenhower? Perhaps if he released the info to the public, it would be infringement from the Confederation because he was doing it? I mean, I highly doubt the Confederation would do something like that if it was going to infringe on the free will of millions/billions of people.

    Edit 2: Upon further contemplation, I realized that would not be infringement by the confederation. Eisenhower would have been the one releasing the information to the public who could choose to disbelieve another 3D entity. If the Confederation came down in ships or started teleporting people around (etc etc) to prove they were "aliens", then they would have no choice to believe and that WOULD be infringement. I still don't quite understand why they weren't infringing upon Eisenhower's free will.. Perhaps because they took the form of 3D beings? I guess that must be it.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Parsons - 09-28-2015, 08:00 PM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Immortalis Vigil - 09-28-2015, 09:58 PM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Parsons - 09-28-2015, 10:57 PM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Immortalis Vigil - 09-28-2015, 11:42 PM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by anagogy - 09-29-2015, 01:49 AM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Adonai One - 09-29-2015, 01:53 AM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by tamaryn - 09-29-2015, 04:36 AM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Billy - 09-29-2015, 02:15 AM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by anagogy - 09-29-2015, 02:20 AM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Billy - 09-29-2015, 06:18 AM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Minyatur - 09-29-2015, 10:34 AM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by anagogy - 09-29-2015, 12:34 PM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Minyatur - 09-29-2015, 01:02 PM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by anagogy - 09-29-2015, 01:35 PM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Minyatur - 09-29-2015, 02:21 PM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Immortalis Vigil - 09-29-2015, 02:30 PM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Adonai One - 09-29-2015, 02:25 AM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by tamaryn - 09-29-2015, 04:39 AM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Jade - 09-29-2015, 10:48 AM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Eddie - 09-29-2015, 11:05 AM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Minyatur - 09-29-2015, 11:13 AM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by Parsons - 09-29-2015, 04:05 PM
    RE: Gradual Disclosure (Ra 24.19) - by AnthroHeart - 09-29-2015, 05:12 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode