09-24-2015, 01:39 PM
(09-24-2015, 12:02 AM)Elros Tar-Minyatur Wrote:(09-23-2015, 07:47 PM)Monica Wrote:(09-23-2015, 07:30 PM)Elros Tar-Minyatur Wrote: Anything can be done by a STO-oriented entity as long as it perceives it in love.
Anything? So a pedophile can 'love' his victim and still polarize STO? Well that's great news for pedophiles. They often say that they 'love' little children.
I do not resonate with pedophily but can comprehend that there is most likely much surrow and struggle for the pedophiles themselves in regards to their programming and the mirror they are given by society.
I agree with what you say here, ETM. Pedophiles are reviled by society and I think in much need of healing and love.
But I wouldn't see that healing as allowing them to violate children. Not here, in 3D. In a higher realm one might see the whole sweep of karma and soul evolution as perfect as it is. But as Ra has said, and I'll paraphrase, if you see a starving person the proper response is to feed them.
In 3D, I would like to see prisons as places of healing, where "criminals" can learn that they can be unconditionally loved. This may start with being loved by shelter dogs. The fragmented portions (those stuck in childhood) of the pedophile would need light, not to stay in shadow and continue to be indulged, in order to evolve away from the unbalanced tendency. I don't mean forcing the pedophile to change, I mean giving him/her the opportunity to evolve, to feel loved and accepted. Our society does not do that at all.
When talking of karma and the traditional aspects of it, there is the concept that one could get off the karmic wheel by forgiving one's self. So it is not mandatory that the pedophile be reviled, or continue to play out violations. The pedophile might want to stay on that trajectory, and this may simply be due to inertia. Humans resist change, but change is inevitable. The whole idea that if one kills someone one must then be killed to balance the karma, is too simplistic to me. There are an infinite number of outcomes available.
I understand detachment, but there is a point at which detachment blurs into separation. One is "outside of it all," "above it all," or "special" in some way.