09-22-2015, 12:34 PM
It statements like this 'This is irrefutably proven by science.' that I just can't get behind. Science does not and cannot irrefutably prove anything, that's not the point of science. Science is a method of analysis and observation based on hypothesis and experiment. Experiments are meant to refine the hypothesis by either supporting it with evidence or providing evidence which requires a new hypothesis. So the hypothesis evolves and changes.
What you have is a great theory and evidence (which I have not viewed, so that is another account for my skepticism because until I actually read and interpret the data myself I can't say I actually have viewed the evidence) but that doesn't establish law or truth, only a plausible possibility of explanation.
So, we turn to systems of logic in order to make the evidence become something useful and from there derive a description. Some do it the other way around and use the description to fit in the evidence.
However, what is evidence? What is proof? All you have shown, in my eyes, is a consistent system of logic. Does that prove it is applicable to all systems? I imagine it is probably potential because you yourself are a potential within the Creator within all things, so naturally a little piece of your philosophy is within.
I applaud your logics, but that, to me, is like complimentary to your talents, not that my own logic is necessarily built the same way. I have pondered over this many times, and it is hard to avoid always coming back to the idea that reality will distort itself according to the perception.
The reality we live in will accommodate and experience either one of our philosophies without a need to change in itself to do so. This suggests to me that the true nature of existence in some way transcends our individual viewpoints.
You speak of choice, but my choice of polarity is clear. I am service to self. What is my deepest desire? To polarize positively. Think about that. If I am serving myself, and I want to serve others, who am I serving?
What you have is a great theory and evidence (which I have not viewed, so that is another account for my skepticism because until I actually read and interpret the data myself I can't say I actually have viewed the evidence) but that doesn't establish law or truth, only a plausible possibility of explanation.
So, we turn to systems of logic in order to make the evidence become something useful and from there derive a description. Some do it the other way around and use the description to fit in the evidence.
However, what is evidence? What is proof? All you have shown, in my eyes, is a consistent system of logic. Does that prove it is applicable to all systems? I imagine it is probably potential because you yourself are a potential within the Creator within all things, so naturally a little piece of your philosophy is within.
I applaud your logics, but that, to me, is like complimentary to your talents, not that my own logic is necessarily built the same way. I have pondered over this many times, and it is hard to avoid always coming back to the idea that reality will distort itself according to the perception.
The reality we live in will accommodate and experience either one of our philosophies without a need to change in itself to do so. This suggests to me that the true nature of existence in some way transcends our individual viewpoints.
You speak of choice, but my choice of polarity is clear. I am service to self. What is my deepest desire? To polarize positively. Think about that. If I am serving myself, and I want to serve others, who am I serving?
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)