09-14-2015, 01:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-14-2015, 02:33 PM by rva_jeremy.
Edit Reason: fancier language
)
That's a good point, Icaro. Well said. I think the deeper conundrum is the tension between a bias towards growth and forward evolution, on the one hand, and timelessness and presence on the other hand. It's difficult sometimes to reconcile the idea that we should be both in the moment, learning from the things we're learning from without judgment on the length of time it takes, and yet think of ourselves as on this vector towards a higher density within a constrained period of time.
Where I'm starting to land on this is very similar to what many of you have said. The efficiency is only from the vantage point of the higher densities, where the entire picture is clear and the evolutionary telos can be plainly evaluated. Nothing is at stake but the great experiment in creator knowing creator. It's kind of like racing leaves in a ditch, like we did as kids, where you cheer them on and want them to go faster, but you're not necessarily attached to the speed in and of itself.
Within third density, there is no concrete, extra-subjective way to measure efficiency at all, so it's only from a broader point of view that the concept has any meaning. It still doesn't make sense to me why those of Ra would care whether we are harvestable or not. In a universe where all is well, why would one cycle or one thousand make a difference? I guess I still have some mystery to meditate on, but I appreciate everybody's input!
Where I'm starting to land on this is very similar to what many of you have said. The efficiency is only from the vantage point of the higher densities, where the entire picture is clear and the evolutionary telos can be plainly evaluated. Nothing is at stake but the great experiment in creator knowing creator. It's kind of like racing leaves in a ditch, like we did as kids, where you cheer them on and want them to go faster, but you're not necessarily attached to the speed in and of itself.
Within third density, there is no concrete, extra-subjective way to measure efficiency at all, so it's only from a broader point of view that the concept has any meaning. It still doesn't make sense to me why those of Ra would care whether we are harvestable or not. In a universe where all is well, why would one cycle or one thousand make a difference? I guess I still have some mystery to meditate on, but I appreciate everybody's input!