Haha...I just got to the next session, and this excerpt is PERFECT....damn. I am officially done participating on any and all threads concerning Infinity because of this excerpt. Enjoy!
Book 2, Session 28
As was my suspicion all along...we can only hope to be correct in our understanding of Infinity, in relation to some other concept as a reference. We can accurately tell of Infinity, relative to some other concept. Our understanding changes completely once the context of a train of thought or line of communication touches the concept of Infinity. No wonder the Infinite Creator is infinitely curious!
Book 2, Session 28
Quote:Questioner: I may be backtracking a little today because I think that possibly we are at the most important part of what we are doing in trying to make it apparent how everything is one, how it comes from one intelligent infinity. This is difficult, so please bear with my errors in questioning. The concept that I have right now of the process, using both what you have told me and some of Dewey Larson’s material having to do with the physics of the process, is that intelligent infinity expands outward from all locations everywhere. It expands outward uniformly like the surface of a bubble or a balloon expanding outward from every point everywhere. It expands outward at what is called unit velocity or the velocity of light. This is Larson’s idea of the progression of what he calls space/time. Is this concept correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This concept is incorrect as is any concept of the one intelligent infinity. This concept is correct in the context of one particular Logos, or Love, or focus of this Creator which has chosen Its, shall we say, natural laws and ways of expressing them mathematically and otherwise. The one undifferentiated intelligent infinity, unpolarized, full and whole, is the macrocosm of the mystery-clad being. We are messengers of the Law of One. Unity, at this approximation of understanding, cannot be specified by any physics but only become activated or potentiated intelligent infinity due to the catalyst of free will. This may be difficult to accept. However, the understandings we have to share begin and end in mystery.
As was my suspicion all along...we can only hope to be correct in our understanding of Infinity, in relation to some other concept as a reference. We can accurately tell of Infinity, relative to some other concept. Our understanding changes completely once the context of a train of thought or line of communication touches the concept of Infinity. No wonder the Infinite Creator is infinitely curious!