08-25-2015, 02:01 PM
(08-25-2015, 12:44 PM)Elros Tar-Minyatur Wrote: In my view being a healer is harsh, it is to consciously make others' sufferings your own when most try to escape from just their own.
the best analogy I have for being a healer is like seeding a torrent. The perfectly balanced healer (say a Jesus), would have 100% copy of the file for '3d'. In all truth, most healers would have much less than a 100%. I am thinking say 70% would be a good percentage to begin one's healing work.
What happens is that the Healer then is able to seed the torrent with whatever amount of balance they have. If the Healer is at 70%, he is capable of providing a copy of his balanced patterns to other peers, and fill in their blank aspects. In doing so, they lose nothing of themselves, and are just radiating the balance that they have. Healing is filling in the blanks for others. The whole 'giving positive energy' to others is a poor model for healing imo. It suggests loss. Positive radiation (by providing a copy of your balance) is the better model. In that sense, highly balanced individuals can passively heal/radiate without formally engaging in the practice of a Practioner-Client model of Healing.
That said - the ability to receive healing aspects is dependent on a desire to change. The Healer can help balance, but can't learn for an individual.
For someone truly ready to heal, the amount of transfer can be incredible.