07-29-2015, 05:00 PM
(07-29-2015, 04:48 PM)Jade Wrote:(07-29-2015, 03:29 PM)Aion Wrote: That is a moot point to what I said. My point is that Ra is not here and yet plenty seem to speak for them.
What makes you believe that Ra isn't here participating? I mean, you've personally confirmed for at least GW just recently that he's of the Ra complex. Just saying, I don't think the other extreme that "Ra is not here" isn't exactly correct, either. I'm also of the opinion that Ra would disagree that any one's personal interpretation of their words is incorrect, but again, what do I know? Anyway, it's all moot eventually. Putting the moot lid on a discussion kind of defeats the purpose of a forum community though, eh?
I just meant in relation to my particular point. I was talking more directly to the point that Ra is not introducing and talking from their perspective. Sure, there are Ra wanderers around, but that's not the same as Ra speaking as a whole.
It's more just a matter of respect in my mind. Like in every day life I think it's rude to speak for others. So far I haven't encountered anyone whom can genuinely and purely channel Ra on their own so I can only assume the words here are not specifically their own. So when people use Ra as an authority figure, I have to question it.
I wasn't trying to put a can on discussion, I was just pointing out that there seem to be a lot of people who try to use Ra's awareness in their argument. Only Ra has Ra's total awareness, so only they can respond to that point.
If anything I just wanted to bring the discussion more towards ourselves rather than always standing behind Ra.