05-26-2015, 09:39 AM
Unconditional love would include yourself so letting yourself be attacked would not actually be unconditionally loving, whereas indifference, in my mind, is more like apathy, where one simply isn't concerned. If someone makes an attempt to infringe upon your free will, I believe it is within the law of free will to correct or defend your free will without infringing upon the person. This is because I think there is a confusion regarding free will in that people think it means that people should always be able to do whatever they want to do. I don't think this is actually how free will is and instead there is more of a fine balance of distribution of will. When this becomes imbalanced through the intentional choice of an individual to weight the will in their direction it is seen as infringement in that one attempts to take a greater portion. I don't believe infringement happens unconsciously, unconscious actions are more random catalyst. I think the more conscious a creator of catalyst is, the less random the catalyst.
Thus, if someone intentionally comes at you with the intent to harm you, I think this is infringement, but if someone accidentally ran in to you and knocked you down because they weren't looking, this is more random catalyst. In both cases you have catalyst to deal with. In the case of infringement, I believe to 'correct' the infringement, you would be able to use self-defense. This choice would thereby be your free will choice to not accept the offer of infringement from the attacker, preserving your free will. This is where I think the key idea comes in.
When the attacker attacks, I believe in the offer of infringement they are opening themselves to whatever it is that they offer. In otherwords if you were to harm them as a result of self-defense it would not be an infringement on their will because they already invited themselves to engage in harm and so when they receive harm it is actually already within their free will, they have accepted this the moment they decided to harm another.
This is the venom of the dark path. It poisons the user while feigning the giving of power. This is why the negative polarity eventually always leads to violence in some form in third-density because they can only gain power through successful infringement. To that effect, they must be able to infringe without being caught or the individual regaining their free will. They attempt to 'trap' the will and use it as a power for themselves. At least, in fourth and early fifth negative.
Positive might defend the self, subdue the attacker to prevent more infringement and then afterwords work to heal whatever emotional, mental or physical imbalance that resulted from the catalyst to thus restore balance. This may include healing for the attacker, or working on feelings of fear, mistrust, anger, revenge, etc.
Negative would take those traumatic feelings they gained from being attacked and turn them upon their attacker.
Thus, if someone intentionally comes at you with the intent to harm you, I think this is infringement, but if someone accidentally ran in to you and knocked you down because they weren't looking, this is more random catalyst. In both cases you have catalyst to deal with. In the case of infringement, I believe to 'correct' the infringement, you would be able to use self-defense. This choice would thereby be your free will choice to not accept the offer of infringement from the attacker, preserving your free will. This is where I think the key idea comes in.
When the attacker attacks, I believe in the offer of infringement they are opening themselves to whatever it is that they offer. In otherwords if you were to harm them as a result of self-defense it would not be an infringement on their will because they already invited themselves to engage in harm and so when they receive harm it is actually already within their free will, they have accepted this the moment they decided to harm another.
This is the venom of the dark path. It poisons the user while feigning the giving of power. This is why the negative polarity eventually always leads to violence in some form in third-density because they can only gain power through successful infringement. To that effect, they must be able to infringe without being caught or the individual regaining their free will. They attempt to 'trap' the will and use it as a power for themselves. At least, in fourth and early fifth negative.
Positive might defend the self, subdue the attacker to prevent more infringement and then afterwords work to heal whatever emotional, mental or physical imbalance that resulted from the catalyst to thus restore balance. This may include healing for the attacker, or working on feelings of fear, mistrust, anger, revenge, etc.
Negative would take those traumatic feelings they gained from being attacked and turn them upon their attacker.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)