The impulse to protect and polarization (Guns)

[VanAlioSaldo]

So I figured I'd blunder in here and start embarrassing myself.  

You and me both friend. You and me both lol

Regarding 3D life or death, I call it FAIR GAME. When its unplanned conflict its truly up to you and your responsibility to maintain yourself enough to stay with your choice, but the wheel of fortune is spun so to say, and if you do end up murdering in defense, Fair Game, both entities were partaking, regardless of being forced into conflict.

That's my solution. The Wheel spins, if you die, you die. If you kill, you kill.

I always thought of approaching such events in a -neutralize- them sense.

I think that's be much easier with a gun for one reason.

If they have a gun and I don't. I lose. I want a chance.

Defend yourself or don't, applying Jesus' story isn't the same in the most general context of a violent person attacking rather than asking/forcing you to do ssomething. So I'd like to not use that example. Ultimately All is a service. If you kill, they learn violence has a down side. If you die, you learn defense has a plus side, prolonging an incarnation is a service to others in the long run if you're not programmed to die and a good person who met a bad person.

Working at a gas station at nights I had to literally devise a manner of how to act in congruency with my beliefs in such areas. I'd rather live and let live than die.

With a gun that means trying not to go for lethal hits (I do want to learn how to best down and incapacitate with body shots.)

Seriously, why not defend yourself with intent not to kill?