05-20-2015, 07:54 PM
(05-20-2015, 04:08 PM)Bring4th_Austin Wrote:Quote:To attain fifty-one percent dedication to the welfare of other-selves is as difficult as attaining a grade of five percent dedication to other-selves. The, shall we say, sinkhole of indifference is between those two.
Is it really "as difficult"? It seems to me that the dedication required for service to self harvestability is more difficult, and Ra indicates elsewhere in the material that our sub-Logos is skewed towards the positive. How is it just as difficult? Why does Ra say this?
It is as difficult.
The reason between the large difference is that in awareness your are self and not other-selves and as such there is more probability for self to generate effort for the self. You truly feel hunger through your hunger, etc.. To be 51% STO means that you will balance to put others above you, and well that is hard as you are self and not other-selves in your awareness of things.
Favorising self is very easy on the contrary as it is a natural occurence of being you before being others. On the other hand there is something that comes to weigh in the balance, other-selves. It is very hard to place no value on how you are perceived by others or to not care in any way about other-selves. As such 95% STS leaves very little place in the heart for other-selves which is hard as you are bathed in a sea of other-selves.
So whether you balance yourself to be slightly more for others than yourself or you balance yourself to be almost totally self-centered in your being, it is as hard.
Also as hard must be thought of in term of 3D humans that go through the process having no clue about it. We may not be the best exemples as we all have already spent much time wearing off the imbalances of our higher selves through many lifetimes, perfecting it toward an invebitable end.