Density/Dimension clarification

[Questioner]

dug up a few quotes...

12.17 ... The fourth density is, by choice, not visible to third density. It is possible for fourth density to be visible. However, it is not the choice of the fourth-density entity to be visible due to the necessity for concentration upon a rather difficult vibrational complex which is the third density you experience.

You interpreted this to mean that 4D generally chooses to be invisible for our benefit.
I interpret it a bit differently. I believe that 4D and up is, simply by nature, not visible to us. For them to become visible is a matter of work and effort. When it specifically helps us for them to be visible to us, they do so. Otherwise, they don't bother since it's extra work for them without any benefit for us.

Suppose that our scientists invented a way to talk to snails. The only drawback is that every sentence takes about half an hour to express or receive. Now some people would very patiently have these conversations with our slow-going 2D associates, but most people would not want to take that much time out of their busy day! Without suggesting that we're sticky or sluggish or live in shells, I imagine that the analogy might be somewhat relevant to what Ra discussed in this quote.

I agree with you that this fits in perfectly with the Venus quote.

I recommend that you seek to understand Ra's material on Ra's own terms. Do this without trying to correlate it with physicists' theories about dark matter. Once you are comfortable with understanding how Ra's own words fit in with Ra's other words, temporarily take "density" as something related to energy/vibration levels for now. After you understand how Ra's comments fit together, only then would it be productive to compare a complete picture of Ra's density discussions with a complete picture of "dark matter" theories. I feel that you are trying to combine two tangents and that your studies may be more productive if you take things one at a time here.

So often the concept of "multiple earths co-existing" is thrown around and at least in my case, taken literally.

Are you familiar with traditional Russian nested dolls? For someone living on the outer surface of the third doll out from the center, everything above them would just be an enclosed shell. For us, that's the edge of fourth dimension which we're just starting to poke into.

In the case of Venus, 1st density must still be activated as you speculate. I wonder why though? We can only speculate. Any ideas?

Ra refers to 1st density as the fundamental elements of earth, air, fire, and water learning from each other. Current scientific theory is that Venus has an abundant of elements and elemental forces. The planet has no shortage of rocks, chemically active atmosphere, cloud cover, lightning, etc. It's easy to suppose that if there was any degree of consciousness inside elemental forces, they would have no shortage of catalyst and learning opportunities in such an active environment.

I rather appreciate Gary's interpretation of this anomalous pattern... that being that in such a vortex of love and light that he lives near in Kentucky, rouge socks are always ascending to 4th density without their counterparts. Although socks often appear to follow in the bias of 3rd density mind/body/spirit complexes of having a life long mate, they frequently do not.

That cracks me up. Hold onto your socks in the Bay Area, they may well find unexpected new types of partnerships! I'm glad to hear that you got the moving logistics all handled.