IUP or LOO? A philosophical debate.

[4Dsunrise]

Can't we be into both?

And what is LoA, the Law of Attraction?

Hey GW -- that's a good insight b/c they are 2 versions of the same thing except that imo the IUP is an updated version of the LOO and is actually not a difficult philosophy to understand -- contrary to what Ra asserted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LoA is the Law of All -- All is One  -- All is I

What is All? All is One -- All is the primary subject and One is the secondary predicate. LoA 

What is One? One is All -- One is the primary subject and All is the secondary predicate. LoO

In both LoA and LOO there is attraction-type action ie inward injection and outward projection -- maybe that's how the sub-principle of Law of Attraction is derived or perceived. It needs to be reworked b/c it has new age distortion and vagueness. Another interesting insight.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
BTW, could you do a favor and edit your last post with the huge graphic? Can you reduce its scale so that it doesn't make the whole thread extra wide? It makes reading other posts a chore. Much appreciated!